2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.77.125427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rectification by charging: Contact-induced current asymmetry in molecular conductors

Abstract: We outline the qualitatively different physics behind charging-induced current asymmetries in molecular conductors operating in the weakly interacting self-consistent field (SCF) and the strongly interacting Coulomb Blockade (CB) regimes. A conductance asymmetry arises in SCF because of the unequal mean-field potentials that shift a closed-shell conducting level differently for positive and negative bias. A very different current asymmetry arises for CB due to the unequal number of open-shell excitation channe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4(a) reveals that the level alignment in the CB regime takes values around 0.1-0.3 eV, indicating a smaller injection barrier with respect to the strong coupling regime. We do not include the charging energy in the formula for the determination of the level alignment, since an analytical expression that relates the two quantities does not exist [40]. We notice, however, that by neglecting the charging energy U, we are overestimating ϵ 0 , nevertheless this overestimation would not change the conclusions of the Letter.…”
Section: (A) and 3(c)mentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4(a) reveals that the level alignment in the CB regime takes values around 0.1-0.3 eV, indicating a smaller injection barrier with respect to the strong coupling regime. We do not include the charging energy in the formula for the determination of the level alignment, since an analytical expression that relates the two quantities does not exist [40]. We notice, however, that by neglecting the charging energy U, we are overestimating ϵ 0 , nevertheless this overestimation would not change the conclusions of the Letter.…”
Section: (A) and 3(c)mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…3(c) have asymmetric voltage onsets; this can be explained by a different voltage drop in the molecule at positive and negative bias, caused for instance by an spatially asymmetric junction configuration or by charging effects (see Refs. [39,40] for a discussion of the possible sources of asymmetry in Coulomb blockade (CB I-V's). Figure 3(c) illustrates the transition in more detail by displaying four I-V and dI=dV-V curves measured just before and after the transition point d 0 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our current theoretical treatment, however, is in the limit of weak coupling to the contacts, and symmetric contact coupling. In the regime of asymmetric and strong contact coupling, we expect novel physics that may be introduced by asymmetric charging [34,35] to affect the thermoelectric transport processes. This will be an object of future research and possible extension of the current work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our recent work in the area of molecular transport [12,13,14,15], as well as compelling recent experiments triggered towards spin-based quantum computation [5,16,17,18,19], both argue for increased activity in this area. This article focusses on the role of both electron-electron and electron phonon correlations in non-equilibrium transport.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%