2019
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2018.2870930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rectification Using Different Types of Cameras Attached to a Vehicle

Abstract: The rectification process is a compulsory step in stereo matching computation. To obtain depth information, stereo camera systems are often installed in vehicles for outdoor and street-related applications, including vehicle and pedestrian detection, lane detection, and traffic sign recognition. In this paper, we propose a rectification method that uses currently available front- and rear-view vehicle cameras to produce rectified stereo images. The proposed method can be employed with different types of camera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To continue the experiment, we need all the multiple pairs of transformations 2T 1 , 3T 1 , 2T 3 , etc., which are calculated by simple algebraic manipulation: for example, 2T 1 = 0T 2 −1 0T 1 , and so on. As it is expected, with these "perfect" geometric transformations, all the procedures presented earlier, namely, the average transformation given by expression (15) and related, produce the perfect result. In other words, the following operations,…”
Section: Propagation Of Uncertainty With a Simulated Experimentssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To continue the experiment, we need all the multiple pairs of transformations 2T 1 , 3T 1 , 2T 3 , etc., which are calculated by simple algebraic manipulation: for example, 2T 1 = 0T 2 −1 0T 1 , and so on. As it is expected, with these "perfect" geometric transformations, all the procedures presented earlier, namely, the average transformation given by expression (15) and related, produce the perfect result. In other words, the following operations,…”
Section: Propagation Of Uncertainty With a Simulated Experimentssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…This pairwise approach must consider all possible combinations between sensor modalities in the pair. These sensor combinations have been addressed in the literature: RGB to RGB camera calibration [1,[11][12][13][14][15], RGB to depth camera (RGB-D cameras) calibration [9,[16][17][18][19][20], camera to 2D LIDAR [1,4,19,[21][22][23][24][25], 2D LIDAR to 3D LIDAR [10], camera to 3D LIDAR [25][26][27], and camera to radar [28].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the original rectification method [21], [26], the algorithms are extended to look for the nine optimized parameters [22], [29]: ( θ ly θ lz θ rx θ ry θ rz g l g r t l t r ). Instead of using the same focal length f for both left and right images, the authors used different values of f for each images, resulting in different values for K l and K r .…”
Section: B Uncalibrated Rectification With Low Geometric Distortionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their approach needs focal length information [24] or a calibration process [25]. Dinh et al [26] presented the first algorithm that estimated a re-scaling ratio using correspondence information by including a FoV compensation module. Their method is inefficient because it requires repeating scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) procedure [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It removes parallax in the vertical direction of images after the rectification process that aligns epipolar lines in calibrated left and right images [11]. The parallax of the right image that reflects the left image is measured using the rectified left and right images, and depth information is extracted [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%