1994
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3468(94)90085-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rectoperineal fistula in newborn boys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Shanbhogue et al [5] reported three male newborns with recto-perineal fistulae, but did not give an exact description of the anat omy. They suggested these were gen uine perineal fistulae with a high rectal pouch.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Shanbhogue et al [5] reported three male newborns with recto-perineal fistulae, but did not give an exact description of the anat omy. They suggested these were gen uine perineal fistulae with a high rectal pouch.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] This entity could be easily mistaken for a low type of ARM, and could lead to an inappropriate perineal surgical procedure. Hence, one should suspect an intermediate ARM when the catheter passes obliquely and cranially, rather than backwards; this should be further confirmed by a contrast study.…”
Section: Letter To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%