2010
DOI: 10.4067/s0301-732x2010000200009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recuento de células somáticas y composición de leche de cabra, según nivel de producción y etapa de lactancia, en un plantel intensivo de la zona central de Chile

Abstract: Arch Med Vet 42, 79-85 (2010)ARTÍCULO SUMMARYThe aim of this study was to characterize milk yield, somatic cell count (SCC) and solids in goat milk according to level of milk yield and lactation period in an intensive dairy goat system. Twenty-five Saanen goats of parity 2, managed under the same conditions, were studied. Goats were assigned into two groups. Group A was defined as low milk yield (< 450 L/lactation) and Group B as high milk yield (> 550 L/lactation). Once a month, a milk yield control was condu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average of SCC was lower than the average of goats reported in the United States (570 × 10 3 cells/mL; Paape et al, 2007) and New Zealand (653 × 10 3 cells/mL; Apodaca-Sarabia et al, 2009), but greater than goats with low milk production from Chile (316 × 10 3 cells/mL; Marín et al, 2010). Milk production was higher than the yield of other Nubian goat populations (Bidot Fernández, 2013;Marín et al, 2010). Averages of points for type traits obtained in this study were similar to those obtained by Castañeda-Bustos et al (2017) for a set of different breeds of US dairy goats, except for FIS and UDE, which were higher (86.3 and 34.6 vs. 83.8 and 31.4 points, respectively), and lower for TDI and RUA (19.5 and 25.9 vs. 23 and 31.4,respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average of SCC was lower than the average of goats reported in the United States (570 × 10 3 cells/mL; Paape et al, 2007) and New Zealand (653 × 10 3 cells/mL; Apodaca-Sarabia et al, 2009), but greater than goats with low milk production from Chile (316 × 10 3 cells/mL; Marín et al, 2010). Milk production was higher than the yield of other Nubian goat populations (Bidot Fernández, 2013;Marín et al, 2010). Averages of points for type traits obtained in this study were similar to those obtained by Castañeda-Bustos et al (2017) for a set of different breeds of US dairy goats, except for FIS and UDE, which were higher (86.3 and 34.6 vs. 83.8 and 31.4 points, respectively), and lower for TDI and RUA (19.5 and 25.9 vs. 23 and 31.4,respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The average of SCC was lower than the average of goats reported in the United States (570 × 10 3 cells/mL; Paape et al, 2007) and New Zealand (653 × 10 3 cells/mL; Apodaca-Sarabia et al, 2009), but greater than goats with low milk production from Chile (316 × 10 3 cells/mL; Marín et al, 2010). Milk production was higher than the yield of other Nubian goat populations (Bidot Fernández, 2013;Marín et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Dairy control provides producers with quantifiable tools for evaluation of their respective productive systems and the performance of their animals (Ait-Saidi et al 2008;Marin et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%