2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.102918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrence of disease activity after fingolimod discontinuation in older patients previously stable on treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although 0/57 patients in our shortinterval group experienced a relapse within 6 months, in a recent review of 128 patients discontinuing fingolimod followed for up to 6 months, overall 12.5% (16/128) experienced a relapse. 14 There have been 2 mechanisms suggested for the fingolimod discontinuation rebound activity. The first mechanism has to do with dramatic postdiscontinuation increase in circulating peripheral lymphocyte counts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although 0/57 patients in our shortinterval group experienced a relapse within 6 months, in a recent review of 128 patients discontinuing fingolimod followed for up to 6 months, overall 12.5% (16/128) experienced a relapse. 14 There have been 2 mechanisms suggested for the fingolimod discontinuation rebound activity. The first mechanism has to do with dramatic postdiscontinuation increase in circulating peripheral lymphocyte counts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although 0/57 patients in our short-interval group experienced a relapse within 6 months, in a recent review of 128 patients discontinuing fingolimod followed for up to 6 months, overall 12.5% (16/128) experienced a relapse. 14 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The possibility of the disease severely worsening after discontinuation ("rebound activity") of fingolimod should be considered, particularly with a disease onset at a younger age, in initially highly active disease, previous treatment with natalizumab, and occurrence of lymphopenia < 0.3 G/L in the first 3 months of treatment [79][80][81]. The exact mechanism of this "rebound activity" is unclear to date; therefore, it is currently unclear whether this is a class effect of all S1PRMs.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 However, such an approach must be carefully evaluated to balance the temptation to stop or delay specific DMTs to reduce the risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes and the potential impact on MS reactivation and disability progression that such a treatment choice could imply. 11,12 Choice of treatment strategy, in general and particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, should take into account differences in MoA and duration of the immunologic effects of each therapy, which can vary and may be short-lasting or persist for some years. 13 The cumulative effect of DMT sequencing on the immune system must also be carefully evaluated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%