2002
DOI: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.36938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrence of hemolytic uremic syndrome after live related renal transplantation associated with subsequent de novo disease in the donor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not unexpected as IF, like CFH, is predominantly synthesized by the liver and thus a renal allograft will not correct the underlying defect. From individuals reported in the literature and unpublished from our own cohort, the recurrence rate in those with CFH mutations and/or CFH deficiency is approximately 80% (2,4,6,7,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is not unexpected as IF, like CFH, is predominantly synthesized by the liver and thus a renal allograft will not correct the underlying defect. From individuals reported in the literature and unpublished from our own cohort, the recurrence rate in those with CFH mutations and/or CFH deficiency is approximately 80% (2,4,6,7,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is important in patients who are being considered for transplantation that it be known whether they have a CFH, IF, or MCP mutation so that they can be informed appropriately of the risks for recurrence. We would not recommend live related transplantation in patients who are known to have either a CFH or an IF mutation unless the donor has been screened for the same mutation, as de novo HUS has been reported to occur in donors within a short period of time after surgery (26). Even if the living related donor is known not to carry the same mutation, the risk for recurrence in the recipient is likely to be as high as observed with cadaveric donors, a risk that some would consider to be unacceptably high for any transplant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients who lost the first kidney graft for recurrence should not receive another transplant. Liverelated renal transplant should also be avoided in that it carries the additional risk to precipitate the disease onset in the healthy donor relative as recently reported in two families (156). New knowledge from genetic studies will predict more accurately the risk for recurrence.…”
Section: Which Treatment For Non-stx-hus?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The results of such screening are often biased by: the inadequacy of the screening and the incomplete penetrance of several mutations. In addition to the risk of relapse in the recipient, the development of aHUS in asymptomatic donors has been reported [124] . Several studies have suggested that calcineurin inhibitors, which have endothelial toxicity, should be avoided; however, mTOR inhibitors may also be toxic to the endothelium, through the down-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [125,126] .…”
Section: Renal Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%