2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrence rates of primary basal cell carcinoma in facial risk areas treated with curettage and electrodesiccation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
58
1
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
58
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Some surgeons still argue in favor of SE or electrodesiccation [14] of facial skin cancers. The limitations of this technique are well documented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some surgeons still argue in favor of SE or electrodesiccation [14] of facial skin cancers. The limitations of this technique are well documented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…58,59 Moreover, C&E may be associated with a longer healing time and inferior cosmetic outcome compared with standard excision, and it is best avoided in cosmetically sensitive areas. 44 …”
Section: Curretage and Electrodessicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[162][163][164] The recurrent tumor has a worse prognosis because the relationship between the tumor and its stroma may be altered as a result of treatment primarily established, facilitating its dissemination. It may show exulcerations, 154 more evident cellular dysplasia, loosening of the tumor cell cords, stromal fibrosis and reduction of peritumoral inflammatory reaction, increasing the spread of cancer cells.…”
Section: Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%