2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32523-7_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrent Binary Patterns and CNNs for Offline Signature Verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In work [20], a two-channel CNN is used for feature extraction and introduces additional genuine signatures in the model for reference. In work [40], the feature extraction is performed with the proposed Recurrent Binary Patterns (RBP) network combined with the two-channel CNN which was proposed in work [20]. Work [43] extracts four kinds of features and constructs classifiers by using RNNs.…”
Section: Experimental Results On the Gpds Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In work [20], a two-channel CNN is used for feature extraction and introduces additional genuine signatures in the model for reference. In work [40], the feature extraction is performed with the proposed Recurrent Binary Patterns (RBP) network combined with the two-channel CNN which was proposed in work [20]. Work [43] extracts four kinds of features and constructs classifiers by using RNNs.…”
Section: Experimental Results On the Gpds Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For any given population of the ω L+ (3G) samples we solve eqs. (9,10) for evaluation of the dispersion parameter Table 1 provides a summary of the proposed experimental setups. The ω T+ class contains the remaining genuine samples ω T+ (G)…”
Section: Methods and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…signal vs. time) [5][6][7] or static-offline (i.e. image) [8][9][10][11][12][13]. An alternative classification of offline signature verification methodologies divides them into a) handcrafted methods, which mainly utilize image processing and computer vision techniques and b) data-driven or learningbased approaches with typical representatives Bags of Visual Words [14,15] sparse representation [11] and deep learning methodologies [8,12,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While previous research efforts have made great progress over the past decades [1], [2], [3], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], there is still much space to address the underlying essential challenges and improve the signature verification performance. The early research efforts extract hand-crafted features and compare the distance between two signatures for verification, such as signature heights, widths, areas [1], [18], local patches LBP [19], [20], [21], [22], and SIFT feature [11].…”
Section: A Signature Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%