1990
DOI: 10.1016/0741-5214(90)90246-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrent carotid stenosis: A consequence of local or systemic factors? The influence of unrepaired technical defects

Abstract: To determine the influence of unrepaired technical defects as well as systemic risk factors for atherogenesis on carotid artery healing after endarterectomy, we conducted a prospective study using intraoperative duplex scanning with spectral analysis to establish the initial status of the artery (N = 131 arteries), and then we studied these vessels at regular postoperative intervals with the same technique (N = 108 arteries, 265 studies). The vessels were divided into the operated and nonoperated segments of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
4

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The combined mortality and neurological stroke morbidity of patients undergoing CEA was 1.5%. 18,19 The present study has demonstrated that the incidence of recurrent stenosis as measured with a Doppler cut point with 95% PPV was 12.7%. However, evaluation of patients within the immediate postoperative interval indicated that the incidence of postoperative stenosis was 4.1%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The combined mortality and neurological stroke morbidity of patients undergoing CEA was 1.5%. 18,19 The present study has demonstrated that the incidence of recurrent stenosis as measured with a Doppler cut point with 95% PPV was 12.7%. However, evaluation of patients within the immediate postoperative interval indicated that the incidence of postoperative stenosis was 4.1%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Reilly et al [12] found non-significant differences between the group with minor defects and those with normal duplex scan at 15 months follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although the number of patients with carotid artery restenosis is relatively small to allow a significant statistical association to be made with the occurrence of neurologic events, nevertheless it is in accordance with the 0%-8% reported in the international literature. 3,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Investigators from The Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study reached opposite conclusions. 22 Although residual disease was found to occur in 4.1% to 6.5%, depending on the positive predictive value (PPV) confidence level desired (90% PPV or 95% PPV, respectively), no correlation was demonstrated between residual or recurrent carotid disease and incidence of late stroke.…”
Section: Residual Defects and Late Cerebrovascular Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%