2016
DOI: 10.14740/jmc2537w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrent Cough Syncope Due to Pertussis in Adults: Report of Three Cases and Review of the Literature

Abstract: Cough syncope, also called "tussive syncope", is a well-recognized syndrome for about 70 years, in which loss of consciousness usually occurs immediately after a violent cough or prolonged bouts of violent coughing, lasting for seconds with rapid restoration of full consciousness. Its precise pathophysiologic mechanism is not fully understood and remains a matter of debate. Although pertussis is a frequent cause of prolonged cough in adults, still its burden in this age group is under-appreciated and under-dia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding prevalence, we agree that cough syncope can be described as 'rare' 12 or 'uncommon', 8,13 but the literature also uses 'very rare', 9 'rare/infrequent', 14 'may not be uncommon', 15 'frequently overlooked' 14 and 'definitely not rare'. 3 Although cough syncope is a well-recognised disorder with several hundred cases reported in the literature, no study has looked at the rates, so significant uncertainty remains as to its frequency. 16 In summary, our view is that the diagnostic criteria recommended by Guo et al 1 are not supported by the literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding prevalence, we agree that cough syncope can be described as 'rare' 12 or 'uncommon', 8,13 but the literature also uses 'very rare', 9 'rare/infrequent', 14 'may not be uncommon', 15 'frequently overlooked' 14 and 'definitely not rare'. 3 Although cough syncope is a well-recognised disorder with several hundred cases reported in the literature, no study has looked at the rates, so significant uncertainty remains as to its frequency. 16 In summary, our view is that the diagnostic criteria recommended by Guo et al 1 are not supported by the literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%