2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrent Intraocular Lens Dislocation in a Patient with Familial Ectopia Lentis

Abstract: A 36-year-old patient presented to the hospital with recurrent dislocation of the intraocular lens (IOL). The patient with the diagnosis of familial ectopia lentis was first operated on for crystalline lens subluxation in the left eye in 2007 and in the right eye in 2009. In both eyes, lens extraction with anterior vitrectomy and transscleral fixation of a rigid IOL was performed. In 2011, the IOL in the right eye luxated into the vitreous cavity due to ocular trauma. The patient underwent a pars plana vitrect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, 27-gauge sclerotomies could minimize this risk [ 38 ]. Moreover, the Carlevale lens is suggested to be the better choice in cases of recurrent IOL dislocation [ 50 ] and in children-age patients [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, 27-gauge sclerotomies could minimize this risk [ 38 ]. Moreover, the Carlevale lens is suggested to be the better choice in cases of recurrent IOL dislocation [ 50 ] and in children-age patients [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The innovative design of the Carlevale IOL, with the haptics angled anterior to the optic plate and with an overall length of 13.5 mm and a 6.5 mm large optic, seem to improve IOL centration [ 20 , 48 ]. This lens also reduced the risk of iris capture, and was more independent from anatomical variations [ 1 , 48 , 50 ]. The good self-centering of the IOL and its stability appeared to limit the development of macular edema [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%