2018
DOI: 10.32412/pjohns.v33i2.267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Paralysis and Hypocalcemia in Superior to Inferior Compared to Inferior to Superior Dissection Approaches in Thyroidectomy

Abstract: Objective: To compare the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and hypocalcemia in patients who underwent thyroidectomy using a superior-inferior versus an inferior to superior approach in identifying the recurrent laryngeal nerve in a tertiary government hospital between January 2012 to December 2016. Methods Design:           Retrospective Cohort Study Setting:           Tertiary Government Hospital Patients:         Records of two hundred forty-one (241) adult patients who u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequencies of various types of RLNI were 68.8% for thermal insult, 28.1% for traction/compression insult, and 3.1% for transverse insult ( 18 ). Inferior-superior dissection (versus superior-inferior dissection) had 4.86 times the risk of permanent RLNI and 1.62 times the risk of temporary RLNI ( 19 ). A remarkable correlation was found between the temporary insult of the recurrent laryngeal nerve and the size of the resection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequencies of various types of RLNI were 68.8% for thermal insult, 28.1% for traction/compression insult, and 3.1% for transverse insult ( 18 ). Inferior-superior dissection (versus superior-inferior dissection) had 4.86 times the risk of permanent RLNI and 1.62 times the risk of temporary RLNI ( 19 ). A remarkable correlation was found between the temporary insult of the recurrent laryngeal nerve and the size of the resection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%