2018 4th International Conference on Recent Advances in Information Technology (RAIT) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/rait.2018.8389063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrent neural network approach to mineral deposit modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SVR uses a penalty term for evaluating the parameters of the model. It is possible to describe the objective function in its whole may be represented as Equation (9).…”
Section: Support Vector Regression (Svr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SVR uses a penalty term for evaluating the parameters of the model. It is possible to describe the objective function in its whole may be represented as Equation (9).…”
Section: Support Vector Regression (Svr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have attempted to estimate the grade of various mineralizations by using multiple machine learning applications. For example, artificial neural networks (ANNs) [6][7][8][9], adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) [10], random forest (RF) [11], and Gaussian process (GP) [11,12], support vector machines (SVM) [13,14] k-nearest neighbors (kNN) [15], and combined kNN-ANN methods [2] are the most popularly used algorithms. There have also been some studies that employ machine learning and deep learning approaches to identify the mineral grade and potential anomalies, according to the following publications: [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, fuzzy uncertainties associated with geological data are being modeled with hybrid neural-fuzzy algorithms [74][75][76][77][78] to quantify uncertainties in evaluating mineral inventory parameters. Similar ANN-based mineral estimation models include Wavelet neural network (WNN) for copper deposit [79], recurrent neural network (RNN) for iron ore deposit [80], Kalman learning algorithm (modified back-propagation neural network) for lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn) deposit [81], local linear radial basis function (LLRBF) neural network for phosphate deposit [82], and radial basis function (RBF) network for offshore placer gold deposit [83,84]. Table 3 shows a summary of some ANN-based resource estimation models.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Network (Ann)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other researchers (Table 1) on the other hand did not clearly indicate the vein like nature of the deposit. However, some studies showed that their AI techniques were applied in heterogenous data sets (Samanta et al, 2004a;Jafrasteh et al, 2018;Gholamnejad et al, 2012;Tahmasebi and Hezarkhani, 2011;Badel et al, 2010;Tahmasebi and Hezarkhani, 2010b;Mahmoudabadi et al, 2008;Singh et al, 2018;Samanta et al, 2005b;Kapageridis, 2002;Wu and Zhou, 1993;Li et al, 2010;Kapageridis and Denby, 1998a;Al-Alawi and Tawo, 1998) which are common in vein deposits.…”
Section: Resources Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%