FDG-PET has been a cornerstone in the work-up of many cancers since the 1980s, and the introduction of PET/CT, a valuable technique that makes it possible to add morphological details to metabolic findings, greatly increased the global accuracy of FDG-PET.However, for many years FDG-PET/CT was not considered particularly useful in the management of urological cancers and deemed ''unsuitable'' for the clinical needs of urologists. This view was based on its low sensitivity and specificity in this setting, attributable primarily to the intrinsic low uptake of FDG by cancers arising from the transitional epithelium of the bladder and ureters and from the cells of the kidneys and prostate, but also to the physiological urinary elimination of FDG.Nevertheless, thanks to the fusion of PET and CT images and to increasing understanding of the metabolic behavior of these cancers this view is now being challenged [1].In this setting, the results of both functional and morphological images, provided these derive from carefully standardized procedures (mainly with regard to the amount of FDG injected, the acquisition time, the use of diuretics, and the scan delay time), seem to be quite interesting, and in many conditions close to those obtained by FDG-PET/ CT in other organs and systems. Moreover, FDG-PET/CT is superior to CT in identifying more aggressive cancers (mainly within the prostate) that warrant closer diagnostic attention and more aggressive therapies.It has been reported that renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can actively take up FDG, and this mainly occurs at high grades of malignancy. Unfortunately, the physiological concentration of FDG in the renal pelvis and calices makes it difficult to distinguish between uptake in cancer tissue and in the urinary tract; furthermore, as RCC can also show low or moderately low uptake of FDG, FDG-PET/CT is not currently used in this cancer. However, particular attention should be devoted to the evaluation of incidentally observed renal solid masses with low uptake or no uptake of FDG, as compared to the surrounding background, in order to identify patients requiring referral for further evaluations, using alternative and more accurate procedures. FDG-PET/CT seems to perform better in local lymph node staging and restaging when compared to standard procedures (ceCT and MRI), especially in cases of suspected distant spread. Moreover, in the era of molecular-targeted therapies, FDG uptake can play a role in predicting overall survival in RCC and is an excellent tool for the evaluation of responses to therapy with new drugs, such as tyrosine-kinase inhibitors [2]; the RCC response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, evaluated using FDG-PET/CT to measure tumor size and FDG uptake after 1 month, can predict progression free survival and overall survival.The use of FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis of upper tract urinary carcinomas (UTUC) has grown slowly compared to its use in other cancer types, although the emergence of PET/ CT as a standard procedure has boosted its role in this setting. FDG-P...