2014
DOI: 10.1111/itor.12107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recursive circle packing problems

Abstract: This paper presents a class of packing problems where circles may be placed either inside or outside other circles, the whole set being packed in a rectangle. This corresponds to a practical problem of packing tubes in a container. Before being inserted in the container, tubes may be put inside other tubes in a recursive fashion. A variant of the greedy randomized adaptive search procedure is proposed for tackling this problem, and its performance is assessed in a set of benchmark instances.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this experiment the specifications from the second experiment are used for out method. We use the Python implementation of GRASP from [27]. Note that SCIP is written in the programming language C, in which an implementation of GRASP would be much faster.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For this experiment the specifications from the second experiment are used for out method. We use the Python implementation of GRASP from [27]. Note that SCIP is written in the programming language C, in which an implementation of GRASP would be much faster.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider two different test sets for our experiments. The first one contains 9 real-world instances from the tube industry, which were used in [27], and is in the following called real test set. Because this test set is too limited for a detailed computational study, we created a second test set containing 800 instances, the rand test set.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations