2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81884-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recursive dynamic functional connectivity reveals a characteristic correlation structure in human scalp EEG

Abstract: Time-varying neurophysiological activity has been classically explored using correlation based sliding window analysis. However, this method employs only lower order statistics to track dynamic functional connectivity of the brain. We introduce recursive dynamic functional connectivity (rdFC) that incorporates higher order statistics to generate a multi-order connectivity pattern by analyzing neurophysiological data at multiple time scales. The technique builds a hierarchical graph between various temporal sca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, it extracts latent representations from group‐level mdFCNs to effectively suppress noise and/or intersubject variations. This is essential to uncover the group‐level structure (Mehrkanoon et al, 2021 ; Zhu, Liu, Mathiak, et al, 2020 ), to support the network decomposition task because high variability leads to superfluous components, and to yield reliable/repeatable findings (Panwar et al, 2021 ; Shellhaas et al, 2022 ; Westende et al, 2020 ). The latter is paramount because phase‐based functional connectivity measures are challenged with relatively lower test–retest reliability when compared to amplitude‐based connectivity metrics (Colclough et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, it extracts latent representations from group‐level mdFCNs to effectively suppress noise and/or intersubject variations. This is essential to uncover the group‐level structure (Mehrkanoon et al, 2021 ; Zhu, Liu, Mathiak, et al, 2020 ), to support the network decomposition task because high variability leads to superfluous components, and to yield reliable/repeatable findings (Panwar et al, 2021 ; Shellhaas et al, 2022 ; Westende et al, 2020 ). The latter is paramount because phase‐based functional connectivity measures are challenged with relatively lower test–retest reliability when compared to amplitude‐based connectivity metrics (Colclough et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the 3 min time‐courses of cortical signals were segmented by a 2 s sliding window with 50% overlap, resulting in 179 temporal segments for each cortical signal. The 2 second window duration was taken to capture at least one cycle of the lowest frequency (low‐δ oscillations), and to be short enough to reflect the rapid temporal dynamics in FCNs (Bassett & Sporns, 2017 ; Du et al, 2018 ; Haartsen et al, 2020 ; Panwar et al, 2021 ). A segment wise cross‐spectrum was computed between all pairs of cortical parcel signals using a discrete Fourier transform, which yielded estimates of phase–phase synchronization via the debiased weighted phase lag index (dwPLI) that is known for robustness against volume conduction effects (Yu, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 75 s window size was chosen because the most relationships were found with it. The higher-order dynamic functional connectivity time series were computed in [ 31 ] using the constant sliding window analysis method. In [ 32 ], the wPLI was computed based on predefined 2 s epochs, and constant sliding window analysis was proposed to extract information about connectivity patterns in the future, focusing on determining the tradeoff between temporal resolution and estimation error, i.e., determining the optimal window size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%