Recursive Nodes with Rich Dynamics as Modeling Tools for Cognitive Functions

The Language Conceptual Formation to Inspire Intelligent Systems

“…The author [29] shows how the brain interacts with the sensations collected from contextual reality, forming meanings through the exchange between heterogeneous categories to produce networks under certain preferential attachments and for more optimized effects. Zhang [30], shows that the cognitive system develops interaction with the context in a more complex way, involving an integrative language in a logical chain, which is corroborated by Gandy [31] and Del-Moral-Hernadez, [32]. Charlton and Andras [33] (p. 330) affirm that the success of recruiting new information depends on the correspondence between the cognitive system and its environment, since for the authors, memories constitute descriptions (possibly compressed) of previous sets of communications in the system.…”

“…The relationship between stimuli in language and changes in neuronal activity patterns helps to discern the specific functions of brain areas [51]; (c) interdependent subsystems linked to a central cognitive system: There is stability in neurodynamics due to a global cortical neurocognitive state [8] resulting from the interaction of different brain areas of coupling tendency (integration) and independent behavior tendency (segregation) [52]. This interaction can occur with signals from bottom to top and from top to bottom [8,32] leading to a brain organization in spacetime patterns. Gangopadhyay et al [49] suggest the adoption of a continuous time dynamic system to mimic the dynamics reported in neurobiology; (d) mediation between real, symbolic, and imaginary kingdoms: The complex interdependence between reality and the human mind occurs through language in its role of processing symbols [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36].…”

“…This interaction can occur with signals from bottom to top and from top to bottom [8,32] leading to a brain organization in spacetime patterns. Gangopadhyay et al [49] suggest the adoption of a continuous time dynamic system to mimic the dynamics reported in neurobiology; (d) mediation between real, symbolic, and imaginary kingdoms: The complex interdependence between reality and the human mind occurs through language in its role of processing symbols [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. The social context interferes with the transition from sensory-motor stimuli to symbolic stimuli and has a constituent role in emotion [28,39,[53][54][55].…”

“…19,24). The linguistic process of an axiomatic-logical foundation takes external stimuli through subsystems [8,32] and carries them to a central system [67] capable of transforming stimuli into information through the symbolization process [28], which has the task of linking the information received in a logical chain, giving them meaning [5,66].…”

“…Miragoli et al [83] evaluated the narrative fragmentation in individuals with memories of child sexual abuse, stating that the traumatic effects interfered in the coherence and cohesion of the narratives of child testimonies. Mullen [32] has highlighted a connection between a history of sexual aggression with affective disorders, exaggerated reactions, and mistaken zeal, showing an imbalance in the way these individuals interpret reality.…”