2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00013-020-01442-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recursive sequences of surjective word maps for the algebraic groups $$\mathrm {PGL}_2$$ and $${{\text {SL}}}_2$$

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. The group G = SU 2 (C) has a finite subgroup H ≈ SL 2 (5). From the definition of BGGKPP-words, it follows that Im w |H ≮ Z(H) (here, w j|H is the restriction of the word map w j : G n → G to a quasisimple finite subgroup H).…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof. The group G = SU 2 (C) has a finite subgroup H ≈ SL 2 (5). From the definition of BGGKPP-words, it follows that Im w |H ≮ Z(H) (here, w j|H is the restriction of the word map w j : G n → G to a quasisimple finite subgroup H).…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…. ]], the corresponding word maps w are surjective on compact Lie groups (there are a number of other examples on simple algebraic groups; see [2,5]). In the present paper, we give an example of a sequence {w j } j∈N of the free group F n such that w j ∈ F j n \ F j+1 n , and each word map w j : SU 2 (C) n → SU 2 (C) is surjective (Theorem 2, Corollary 7.1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%