Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference 2004
DOI: 10.23919/acc.2004.1383604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recursive state estimation in nonlinear processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The filter might then learn the wrong state too well and diverge . The importance of choosing a consistent pair of x̂ 0 and P 0 is also emphasized by other authors …”
Section: Defining the Design Parameters Of The Ekfmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The filter might then learn the wrong state too well and diverge . The importance of choosing a consistent pair of x̂ 0 and P 0 is also emphasized by other authors …”
Section: Defining the Design Parameters Of The Ekfmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As a benchmark problem, we consider the popular batch reactor example which was originally published by Haseltine and Rawlings and later used in a number of other publications for estimator performance comparison. ,, The model describes the following reversible gas-phase reactions that take place in an isothermal, well-mixed batch reactor with constant volume: left rightauto fittrue100% A k 2 k 1 B + C (13) 2 B k 4 k 3 C (14) The true reaction rate constants are given as k = [ k 1 , k 2 , k 3 , k 4 ] T = [0.5, 0.05, 0.2, 0.01] T .…”
Section: Benchmark Problem: Batch Reactormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The importance of choosing a consistent pair of an initial state estimate guess and initial state estimate covariance matrix is also emphasized by other authors (Valappil and Georgakis, 2000). For instance, Vachhani et al (2004) emphasized the role of a consistent choice of initial state estimate covariance matrix and consequently the use of alternate initial state information for their simulations. Similarly, Prakash et al (2010) silently adapt their initial state estimate to be more consistent with the original initial state estimate covariance matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, even if the filters do not diverge, convergence may be slow if the initial state covariance matrices do not account for the initial state estimates being far from the true values. 17,18 The method based on Maximum Likelihood Estimation presented in [5] is used to obtain initial estimates of the parameters of interest. Although the estimation will be biased in the presence of high remnant power, the initial estimates obtained are sufficiently accurate to initialize the DEKF with.…”
Section: Initializationmentioning
confidence: 99%