2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.algal.2015.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recyclable polyampholyte flocculants for the cost-effective dewatering of microalgae and cyanobacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some applications may require remediation of the flocculants themselves from the solids stream with a downstream purification process, fortunately polyamphoteric flocculants with pH-dependent charge character provide opportunities for novel process implementation. We have shown recently that the flocculant -biocolloid interactions may be inverted (i.e., become repulsive interactions) by adjustment of the system pH following the solids recovery, such that the flocculant can be desorbed, recovered, and recycled for future usage [49,52]. Not only would such functional materials reduce the cost burden for flocculation, but may also enhance downstream processes (e.g., in microalgal harvesting by improving oil recovery from the concentrated biomass and reducing equipment fouling).…”
Section: Primary Dewatering By Flocculation Reduces the Burden On A Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although some applications may require remediation of the flocculants themselves from the solids stream with a downstream purification process, fortunately polyamphoteric flocculants with pH-dependent charge character provide opportunities for novel process implementation. We have shown recently that the flocculant -biocolloid interactions may be inverted (i.e., become repulsive interactions) by adjustment of the system pH following the solids recovery, such that the flocculant can be desorbed, recovered, and recycled for future usage [49,52]. Not only would such functional materials reduce the cost burden for flocculation, but may also enhance downstream processes (e.g., in microalgal harvesting by improving oil recovery from the concentrated biomass and reducing equipment fouling).…”
Section: Primary Dewatering By Flocculation Reduces the Burden On A Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For suspensions in the pH range of 8 to 12, it is therefore concluded that polyamphoteric flocculants provide a flocculating advantage over the cationic polyelectrolytes, which results from the presence of negative charges on the flocculant that interact with positive charges on the surface of the microalgal cells. This pH range is an important one for many biocolliodal and cellular suspensions as, for example, typical microalgal cultures are often basic (pHs of 8~10)and adopt a natural pH that is dependent upon many parameters including the stage of growth.Moreover, we have shown previously that the cationic polyelectrolytic and polyampholytic flocculants were able to remove >98% of microalgae from standard cultures when added in concentrations of 70-150 and 40-80 ppm, respectively, and allowing for a sedimentation time of 10 min[49,52]. The lower dosages required by the polyampholytic tPA flocculant cannot be explained by differences in flocculant molecular weight or molecular structure(Table 1), and rather are suggested to arise from the inclusion of the negative acrylic acid group that leads to electrostatic attraction with the positively-charged functionalities that are distributed on the cell surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common approach to dewatering microalgae is through a two-step process from dilute suspensions: (i) concentration of dilute suspensions to a slurry; and (ii) further dewatering the slurry to obtain a 'cake' . These steps are referred to as primary and secondary dewatering respectively [8,9]. The primary step aims at concentrating a suspension to a slurry of 2-7% biomass concentration, while the secondary further dewatering step could attain 15-30%, from which any further concentration will require an additional drying step [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, low biomass recovery efficiency, high capital costs and/or high operating costs have become common attributes of currently deployed dewatering techniques. For a myriad of reasons, it is difficult to apply conventional dewatering techniques for microalgae biomass [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To allow for the recovery and reuse of flocculants or coagulants, detachment of the flocculants or coagulants from the microalgae must be achieved, for example by inducing changes in their surface properties, such as surface charge and wetting properties. , Such changes may be triggered by the presence of switchable or stimuli-responsive groups on the surface of the flocculants or coagulants. We recently reported a new CNC that is a CO 2 -switchable nanomaterial prepared by surface modification with 1-(3-aminopropyl)­imidazole (APIm) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%