2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recycle of metals for end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) and relation to Kyoto protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Policies should be readily available to the public through government websites, brochures, or community outreach programs. This accessibility ensures that individuals can easily access and refer to policy information when needed [47,48].…”
Section: Policy Understanding and Transparencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policies should be readily available to the public through government websites, brochures, or community outreach programs. This accessibility ensures that individuals can easily access and refer to policy information when needed [47,48].…”
Section: Policy Understanding and Transparencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…End-of-life vehicles (ELVs) have, in the first phase, been considered as an environmental problem, which must be solved through many decision-making approaches, directives, and standards [30]. Consequently, ELV recycling is a thoroughly researched issue related to different aspects, such as volume [31,32], dismantling technologies and disassemblability [33][34][35][36], emission-control and decomposition [37,38], impact of hybrid and electric vehicles [39,40], recycling technologies [4,[41][42][43][44], socio-economic benefits [45][46][47][48][49], development of financial policies [50], plastics recycling [51,52], impact on quality and environment [53-56], information technologies application [57,58], sustainability [59], reverse logistics [29], legislative boundaries and environmental performance [60], and infrastructure [61,62]. Other research sources present methods and business potential for components re-use [63], definition of treatment centers for ELV processing [64], presentation of evaluation economics and material destinations remanufacturing optimization model according to a ELV legislation [65], passenger vehicles aluminum parts recycling [66], development of ELV costing frameworks [58], application of Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) method to select the best ELV management method [67], and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP...…”
Section: End-of-life Vehicle (Elv) Recycling Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, there are significant energy benefits, since the production of iron and aluminum products use much less energy when recycled raw materials are used than when ores from primary production are used as inputs. Research has shown that when recycling scrap iron per ton of metal, there are savings in the emission of 1.69 t of CO 2 gas, or 17.7 GJ of energy, while recycling aluminum per ton saves a total of 9.5 t of CO 2 or 86.2 GJ of energy [57] (pp. 2448-2449).…”
Section: Socio-economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%