Recycled wastewater as a potential source of microplastics in irrigated soils from an arid-insular territory (Fuerteventura, Spain)

Pérez-Reverón, Raquel; González‐Sálamo, Javier; Hernández-Sánchez, Cintia; González-Pleiter, Miguel; Hernández-Borges, Javier; Díaz-Peña, Francisco Javier

doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152830

Cited by 72 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Regarding the composition, they were mainly cellulosic (46.0%), polypropylene (24.3%), and polyethylene terephthalate (24.3%). Very recently, Pérez-Reverón et al also determined the presence of MPs in recycled wastewater from the Canary Islands [ 24 ], finding in the final effluent of five wastewater treatment plants a high prevalence of cellulosic (44.0%) and polyester (18.0%) microfibers (84.4–100%), mainly colourless (15.0–33.3%) and blue (40.0–55.6%). The average size of the fibres was 786.9 ± 812.1 μm.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Microplastics Determination in Gastrointestinal Tracts of European Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and Gilt-Head Sea Bream (Sparus aurata) from Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain)

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Microplastic pollution has an extremely widespread distribution, to the extent that microplastics could be ingested by aquatic organisms, including species of commercial importance for fisheries and aquaculture. In this work, the anthropogenic particles content of the gastrointestinal tracts of 86 individuals of cultivated European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax, n = 45) and gilt-head sea bream (Sparus aurata, n = 41) from Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain) was determined. Samples were bought at local markets and directly transported to the laboratory. After the dissection of the fishes and digestion of the gastrointestinal tracts in 10% KOH (w/v) at 60 °C for 24 h, the digests were filtered (50 µm stainless-steel mesh) and visualized under a stereomicroscope, finding that most of the items were colourless (47.7% for Dicentrarchus labrax and 60.9% for Sparus aurata) and blue (35.3% vs. 24.8%) microfibers, with an average length of 1957 ± 1699 µm and 1988 ± 1853 µm, respectively. Moreover, 15.3% of the microfibres were analysed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, showing the prevalence of cellulosic fibres together with polyester, polyacrylonitrile, and poly(ether-urethane). This pattern (microplastics shapes, colours, sizes, and composition) clearly agrees with previous studies carried out in the Canary Islands region regarding the determination of microplastics in the marine environment.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Microplastics Determination in Gastrointestinal Tracts of European Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and Gilt-Head Sea Bream (Sparus aurata) from Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain)

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Soil contamination can come from many sources, including compost [ 147 ], mulch film [ 188 ], greenhouse materials, irrigation tools [ 189 ], plant protection products, fertilizers [ 190 ], municipal solid waste, sewage treatment plants [ 191 ], used tires [ 119 , 164 ], and precipitation [ 192 ]. The presence of plastic particles in soils from China [ 193 , 194 , 195 ], Iran [ 196 ], Brazil [ 197 ], and Spain [ 198 ] was confirmed. It was found that the distribution of MPs in soils showed differences not only regionally but also in-depth [ 10 ].…”

Section: Packaging Waste Dumpmentioning

confidence: 99%

Microplastics Derived from Food Packaging Waste—Their Origin and Health Risks

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Plastics are commonly used for packaging in the food industry. The most popular thermoplastic materials that have found such applications are polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), and polystyrene (PS). Unfortunately, most plastic packaging is disposable. As a consequence, significant amounts of waste are generated, entering the environment, and undergoing degradation processes. They can occur under the influence of mechanical forces, temperature, light, chemical, and biological factors. These factors can present synergistic or antagonistic effects. As a result of their action, microplastics are formed, which can undergo further fragmentation and decomposition into small-molecule compounds. During the degradation process, various additives used at the plastics’ processing stage can also be released. Both microplastics and additives can negatively affect human and animal health. Determination of the negative consequences of microplastics on the environment and health is not possible without knowing the course of degradation processes of packaging waste and their products. In this article, we present the sources of microplastics, the causes and places of their formation, the transport of such particles, the degradation of plastics most often used in the production of packaging for food storage, the factors affecting the said process, and its effects.

show abstract

“…Microplastic contamination on land was estimated to be 4-23-fold larger than that of oceans [61]. Soils may be contaminated by M/NPs from wastewater irrigation [62], plastic mulching [63], sludge utilization [64], atmospheric deposition [65], road runoff [66]. Indeed, M/ NPs have been detected in floodplains, coastal beaches, and agricultural soils.…”

Section: Soilmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coronas of micro/nano plastics: a key determinant in their risk assessments

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As an emerging pollutant in the life cycle of plastic products, micro/nanoplastics (M/NPs) are increasingly being released into the natural environment. Substantial concerns have been raised regarding the environmental and health impacts of M/NPs. Although diverse M/NPs have been detected in natural environment, most of them display two similar features, i.e.,high surface area and strong binding affinity, which enable extensive interactions between M/NPs and surrounding substances. This results in the formation of coronas, including eco-coronas and bio-coronas, on the plastic surface in different media. In real exposure scenarios, corona formation on M/NPs is inevitable and often displays variable and complex structures. The surface coronas have been found to impact the transportation, uptake, distribution, biotransformation and toxicity of particulates. Different from conventional toxins, packages on M/NPs rather than bare particles are more dangerous. We, therefore, recommend seriously consideration of the role of surface coronas in safety assessments. This review summarizes recent progress on the eco–coronas and bio-coronas of M/NPs, and further discusses the analytical methods to interpret corona structures, highlights the impacts of the corona on toxicity and provides future perspectives.

show abstract

Recycled wastewater as a potential source of microplastics in irrigated soils from an arid-insular territory (Fuerteventura, Spain)

Cited by 72 publications

References 51 publications

Microplastics Determination in Gastrointestinal Tracts of European Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and Gilt-Head Sea Bream (Sparus aurata) from Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain)

Microplastics Determination in Gastrointestinal Tracts of European Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and Gilt-Head Sea Bream (Sparus aurata) from Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain)

Microplastics Derived from Food Packaging Waste—Their Origin and Health Risks

Coronas of micro/nano plastics: a key determinant in their risk assessments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About