2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recycling of plastic box waste in the concrete mixture as a percentage of fine aggregate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ductility index increased with increasing the PET waste percentage in the concrete beams, where beams B 5 %, B 7.5 %, B 10 %, B 12.5 %, B 15 %, and B 20 % recorded ductility indices of 3.21, 3.78, 3.83, 4.40, 5.18, and 5.47, respectively, with increase ratios of 12.13 %, 32.04 %, 34.03 %, 53.82 %, 81.12 %, and 91.37 %, respectively, compared with the reference beam that recorded the lowest ductility index of 2.89. This finding corresponds to Kim's conclusion in his study of the effect of PET fibers on the structural behavior of concrete beams [10] and Adnan's conclusion in the investigation ofthe effect of using plastic box waste as a percentage of fine aggregate on the structural behavior of concrete beams [24].…”
Section: Ductility Indexsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Ductility index increased with increasing the PET waste percentage in the concrete beams, where beams B 5 %, B 7.5 %, B 10 %, B 12.5 %, B 15 %, and B 20 % recorded ductility indices of 3.21, 3.78, 3.83, 4.40, 5.18, and 5.47, respectively, with increase ratios of 12.13 %, 32.04 %, 34.03 %, 53.82 %, 81.12 %, and 91.37 %, respectively, compared with the reference beam that recorded the lowest ductility index of 2.89. This finding corresponds to Kim's conclusion in his study of the effect of PET fibers on the structural behavior of concrete beams [10] and Adnan's conclusion in the investigation ofthe effect of using plastic box waste as a percentage of fine aggregate on the structural behavior of concrete beams [24].…”
Section: Ductility Indexsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…5. Generally, the partial replacement of natural sand with PP was accompanied by reductions in both strengths [1,17,21,25,26]. More importantly, the addition of small portions of EVA brought positive changes to the strain patterns.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…5a). Note that the increased pore volume of matrices with RWP could also reduce the overall mechanical performances [17,21,115], resulting in poorer bonding between RWPs and the cement matrix. The pore volumes of matrices were observed by l-XCT and discussed in the following section.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rubber is responsible for increasing the elasticity and damping of the novel aseismic material, and the river sand is utilized to provide enough strength for it. Although some novel fine aggregates were put forward instead of river sand, e.g., blast furnace slag [ 33 ], waste glass [ 34 ] and plastic box waste [ 35 ], low workability and some substandard physical properties (e.g., voids and abrasion) make them difficult to be adopted in practical projects [ 36 ]. Therefore, river sand is still considered the ideal fine aggregate for composing the novel concrete material in this work.…”
Section: Experiments Of a Novel Aseismic Concrete Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%