2002
DOI: 10.1002/app.11307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recycling of postconsumer poly(ethylene terephthalate) and high‐density polyethylene by compatibilized blending

Abstract: Two ways of recovering the properties of the scrap plastics poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and highdensity polyethylene (HDPE) were analyzed: (1) blending incompletely segregated polymers with a compatibilizer and (2) blending nonsegregated polymers with a small amount (2 pph) of another compatibilizer. The advancement of the compatibilization reaction in a twin-screw extruder depended on the residence time and intensity of mixing according to melt viscosity measurements and scanning electron microscopy ob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
52
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the compatibility of the blends with 7.5 php is worse than that of blend with 5 php as observed in SEM images. This indicates that a higher content of E-GMA may generate the crosslinking of HDPE and worsen the blend properties [10]. Therefore, it can be concluded that the amount of compatibilizer used should have an optimal limitation [21], between 5 and 7.5 php in this study.…”
Section: Semmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, the compatibility of the blends with 7.5 php is worse than that of blend with 5 php as observed in SEM images. This indicates that a higher content of E-GMA may generate the crosslinking of HDPE and worsen the blend properties [10]. Therefore, it can be concluded that the amount of compatibilizer used should have an optimal limitation [21], between 5 and 7.5 php in this study.…”
Section: Semmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Of all the compatibilizers used in HDPE/PET blends, reactive functional groups of maleic anhydride (MA) and glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) are the most common. Graft copolymer containing MAs such as MA grafted polyethylene (PE-g-MA) [4] [7] [9], HDPE-g-MA [10] and MA grafted styrene-ethylene-butenestyrene copolymer (SEBS-g-MA) [9] [10] have been reported. Whilst, random copolymer containing GMA such as HDPE-g-GMA [10], E-GMA [9] [11], ethylene-ethyl acrylate-glycidyl methacrylate (E-EA-GMA) [11] and ethylene-butyl acrylate-glycidyl methacrylate (EBAGMA) [12] are commonly used for investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the strategies described are similar to the methods mentioned before, and mostly polyolefin-based compatibilizers grafted with anhydrides or acids can be found [102][103][104][105].…”
Section: Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Pawlak et al found that though the mechanical properties of R-PET rich blends were markedly improved by adding E-GMA, better performance was obtained with SEBS-g-MA in R-PE rich blends. 8 Carté et al produced a PET/ PE (50/50) blend containing 20 pph (part per hundred) SEBS-g-MA exhibiting a twofold increase in elongation at break relative to PE. 9 Functionalized polyolefins with reactive groups such as maleic anhydride, acrylic acid, and glycidyl methacrylate, can also effectively enhance the morphology and physical/mechanical properties of R-PET/R-HDPE blends.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%