Red and Processed Meat Intake Is Associated with Higher Gastric Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Epidemiological Observational Studies

Abstract

BackgroundRed and processed meat was concluded as a limited-suggestive risk factor of gastric cancer by the World Cancer Research Fund. However, recent epidemiological studies have yielded inconclusive results.MethodsWe searched Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from their inception to April 2013 for both cohort and case-control studies which assessed the association between red and/or processed meat intake and gastric cancer risk. Study-specific relative risk estimates were polled by random-effect or fixed-effect models.ResultsTwelve cohort and thirty case-control studies were included in the meta-analysis. Significant associations were found between both red (RR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.22–1.73) and processed (RR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.26–1.65) meat intake and gastric cancer risk generally. Positive findings were also existed in the items of beef (RR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.04–1.57), bacon (RR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.17–1.61), ham (RR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.00–2.06), and sausage (RR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.16–1.52). When conducted by study design, the association was significant in case-control studies (RR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.33–1.99) but not in cohort studies (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.90–1.17) for red meat. Increased relative risks were seen in high-quality, adenocarcinoma, cardia and European-population studies for red meat. And most subgroup analysis confirmed the significant association between processed meat intake and gastric cancer risk.ConclusionsOur findings indicate that consumption of red and/or processed meat contributes to increased gastric cancer risk. However, further investigation is needed to confirm the association, especially for red meat.

Salt Processed Food and Gastric Cancer in a Chinese Population

“…The subjects who preferred very salty food in diet had a more than 30-fold risk, compared to those preferring to non-salty food, which was in agreement with previous studies reporting that salt was a risk factor for gastric cancer (Nazario et al, 1993;Ramon et al, 1993;Tsugane et al, 2004). Although there was inconsistency regarding results of the association between salted meat and gastric cancer in literatures (Sjödahl et al, 2008;Keszei et al, 2012;Van Den Brandt et al, 2013), recent reviews summarized that increased consumption of processed meat including salted meat was significantly associated with gastric cancer Zhu et al, 2013). Another study conducted in a high risk area of gastric cancer in northwest of China also suggested long-term exposure to salted pork might result in repeated gastric mucosal damage and repair, and finally in severe dysplasia and malignancy (Yuan et al, 1996).…”

Association of Milk and Meat Consumption with the Development of Breast Cancer in a Western Mexican Population

“…Certain varieties of meat that can reduce (fish and seafood) or increase (luncheon meat) the risk for certain types of cancers were not among the study aims of this analysis, and so their consumption was not taken into consideration. This aspect was made clear to the patients during the interview [19,20]. Consumption was understood as the habitual intake during the majority of the individual's lifetime.…”

Identifying and targeting cancer stem cells in the treatment of gastric cancer

“…A high salt intake has been identified as a risk factor for gastric cancer in case‐control studies 5. Red and processed meat intake was associated with a 43% increase in the risk for gastric cancer 6. Epstein‐Barr virus‐encoded small RNA has been detected in up to 17.9% of patients with gastric cancer 7…”