2022
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.998438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Red blood cells morphology and morphometry in adult, senior, and geriatricians dogs by optical and scanning electron microscopy

Abstract: Red blood cells (RBC) morphologic evaluation through microscopy optical (OM) and SEM, provides information to forecast, evaluate, and monitor the functioning of many organs. Factors, such aging and diseases affect RBC morphology in both, human and animals. SEM is useful to evaluate RBC morphology, although its use in diagnosis and evaluation in dogs is limited, due to the availability and cost. The aim of this research was to assess the normal RBC morphology in adult, senior and geriatrician dogs, clinically h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variability in erythrocyte size, anisocytosis, is useful for the describing, classifying, or prognosing of pathophysiological phenomena in dogs ( 1 – 4 ), such as anemia ( 5 9 ), microcytosis ( 10 , 11 ), quatrefoil red blood cells ( 12 ), cardiopulmonary diseases ( 13 18 ), pancreatitis ( 19 ), inflammatory bowel disease ( 20 ), or diabetes mellitus ( 21 ), and of physiological phenomena such as sex and aging ( 22 , 23 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Variability in erythrocyte size, anisocytosis, is useful for the describing, classifying, or prognosing of pathophysiological phenomena in dogs ( 1 – 4 ), such as anemia ( 5 9 ), microcytosis ( 10 , 11 ), quatrefoil red blood cells ( 12 ), cardiopulmonary diseases ( 13 18 ), pancreatitis ( 19 ), inflammatory bowel disease ( 20 ), or diabetes mellitus ( 21 ), and of physiological phenomena such as sex and aging ( 22 , 23 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluating a blood smear by conventional microscopy requires experience ( 26 ) and is prone to subjective assessment, which may lead to variability within and between observers. Furthermore, different grading schemes exist, some with very simple categorizations such as “absent or present” ( 9 , 22 ). Others have applied subjective grading on a scale from +1 to +4, with +1 being the smallest amount ( 27 ), or grading +1 to +4 based on the number of variable-sized erythrocytes in a monolayer at 1,000x microscopic field ( 28 ) or high-power field (HPF) ( 21 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%