The red cell distribution width (RDW), the coefficient of variation of the red cell mean corpuscular volume (MCV), is a quantitative description of anisocytosis, or variation in red cell size. In general, a higher RDW reflects increased red blood cell destruction such as in hemolytic disorders and nutritional deficiency conditions, including iron, vitamin B12, and folate deficiency. Recent studies have shown a strong independent association between higher RDW and the risks of adverse vascular outcomes in patients with various vascular diseases. 1) Population studies have identified RDW as a predictor of all-cause 2) and cardiac mortality. 3) RDW has also been associated with worsened renal function, 4) evi-Background: Red cell distribution width (RDW) is a prognostic marker in vascular diseases. While increased RDW predicts mortality and outcomes after ischemic stroke, evidence regarding its prognostic significance in stroke rehabilitation is lacking. Thus, the present study investigated the relationship of RDW with stroke, orthopedic, and deconditioning rehabilitation outcomes. Methods: This prospective comparative study included three groups (stroke, orthopedic, and deconditioning) of older adult patients hospitalized for rehabilitation. The patients in each group were divided into two subgroups according to whether they had high (>14.5%) or normal (≤14.5%) RDW levels on admission. Functional outcome was assessed by total and motor FIM (Functional Independence Measure) score changes and efficiency at admission and on discharge. Results: Of the 234 eligible patients, 108 (46.2%) had high RDW. Of the 50 stroke rehabilitation patients, 13 (26%) had high RDW. FIM change and efficiency scores were significantly lower in patients with high RDW only in the stroke rehabilitation group. However, multiple linear regression analysis showed that high RDW was not independently associated with total and motor FIM gain or total and motor FIM efficiency. Conclusion: High RDW levels on admission to rehabilitation were associated with poor rehabilitation outcome in stroke patients but were not an independent risk factor for rehabilitation outcomes.