2016
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.7670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Red deer bone and antler collagen are not isotopically equivalent in carbon and nitrogen

Abstract: RATIONALEBone and antler collagen δ 13 C and δ15 N values are often assumed to be equivalent when measured in palaeodietary, palaeoclimate and palaeocological studies. Although compositionally similar, bone grows slowly and is remodelled whereas antler growth is rapid and remodelling does not occur. These different patterns of growth could result in isotopic difference within antler and between the two tissue types. Here we test whether red deer (Cervus elaphus) bone and antler δ 13 C and δ15 N values are isot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Captive, control-fed, white-tailed deer had a mean δ 15 N for antler collagen of +4.29±0.42 ‰ [69]; for a pure C 3 diet, the mean was +3.73±0.43‰. Subtracting 25 red deer (Cervus elaphus) antler collagen values from same-individual bone collagen values [70] resulted in a mean difference of +0.38±0.37 ‰, suggesting that there is essentially no difference between bone collagen and antler collagen δ 15 N values. As a result, we subtracted 4.0 ‰ from individual archaeological deer bone collagen values to estimate average consumed plant δ 15 N values, resulting in a mean of +1.6±1.0 ‰ and a median of +1.5 ‰ (Fig 2).…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Captive, control-fed, white-tailed deer had a mean δ 15 N for antler collagen of +4.29±0.42 ‰ [69]; for a pure C 3 diet, the mean was +3.73±0.43‰. Subtracting 25 red deer (Cervus elaphus) antler collagen values from same-individual bone collagen values [70] resulted in a mean difference of +0.38±0.37 ‰, suggesting that there is essentially no difference between bone collagen and antler collagen δ 15 N values. As a result, we subtracted 4.0 ‰ from individual archaeological deer bone collagen values to estimate average consumed plant δ 15 N values, resulting in a mean of +1.6±1.0 ‰ and a median of +1.5 ‰ (Fig 2).…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isotopic results for teeth were excluded unless the samples were adult mammoth teeth or bison third molars, as the isotopic compositions of these elements reflect adult rather than juvenile diets (Balasse et al, 1999;. Isotopic data for antler were excluded as this tissue reflects seasonal and/or physiological signals (Finstad and Kielland, 2011;Miller et al, 492 2014; Stevens and O'Connell, 2016). When multiple data were available for a given sample as 493 the result of radiocarbon measurements, we accepted the stable isotope results associated with 494 the oldest date for collagen that had undergone ultrafiltration.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings are consistent with those of prior bulk collagen isotopic studies. Stevens and O'Connell (2016) noted that the pattern of increasing δ 15 N from antler base to the tip was not consistent with rapid growth as the primary control on the nitrogen isotope signal. If such was the case, an S -shaped δ 15 N pattern would be expected, as initial antler growth is relatively slow, followed by a period of exponential growth and then a final period of slow growth before antler death (Stevens and O'Connell 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Stevens and O'Connell (2016) noted that the pattern of increasing δ 15 N from antler base to the tip was not consistent with rapid growth as the primary control on the nitrogen isotope signal. If such was the case, an S -shaped δ 15 N pattern would be expected, as initial antler growth is relatively slow, followed by a period of exponential growth and then a final period of slow growth before antler death (Stevens and O'Connell 2016). Darr and Hewitt's (2008) feeding study also suggests that physiological mechanisms are not the primary control on antler δ 13 C and δ 15 N. Their measured enrichments in 13 C and 15 N from diet to antler were consistent with such increases from diet to bone reported in similar studies (Cormie and Schwarcz 1994; Koch et al 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%