2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10745-012-9527-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

REDD Policy Impacts on Indigenous Property Rights Regimes on Palawan Island, the Philippines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once separated from the forest commons typically in the uplands, the rise in individualised tenure renders former swidden lands alienable to others through formal or informal market transactions. In contrast, in cases where swidden fallows regrow into mature forest (as usufruct rights attenuate over time and space), fewer access restrictions prevail (Dressler et al 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once separated from the forest commons typically in the uplands, the rise in individualised tenure renders former swidden lands alienable to others through formal or informal market transactions. In contrast, in cases where swidden fallows regrow into mature forest (as usufruct rights attenuate over time and space), fewer access restrictions prevail (Dressler et al 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such situations, the underlying rationale of large‐scale land investments based on centralization of control and commoditization of markets for land rights remains fundamentally at odds with what Dressler et al. (: 689) have termed ‘the messy reality of upland living’ in the Philippines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…International finance institutions such as the World Bank led large‐scale programmes for collective land titling of indigenous lands during the 1980s and 1990s, and the Philippines also saw the advent of the 1997 Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act (IPRA). Yet, bureaucratic methods of claiming titles or use rights under IPRA have often functioned as means of further cementing state and elite control over resources (Dressler et al., ; Novellino and Dressler, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical studies have shown that large-scale investments in reforestation increase the risk of creating new claims on forested landscapes that may potentially overlap with existing claims, thus creating or exacerbating existing conflicts over land use rights and resource access (Sikor & Lund 2009;Dressler et al 2012). It may lead to enhanced state or corporate control over 'degraded' forests, and increase state forestry bureaucracy or corruption (Barr & Sayer 2012).…”
Section: Forest Landscape Restoration: a Myriad Of Local Practicementioning
confidence: 99%