2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reddit: A novel data source for cultural ecosystem service studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specificity of information that can be elicited from qualitative content of social media depends on what and how the content is analyzed. Multiple studies have used images posted on photo-sharing social media platforms (e.g., Flickr and Instagram) to investigate parks and landscape experiences ( Callau, Albert, Rota, & Giné, 2019 ; P. Chang and Olafsson, 2022 , Conti and Lexhagen, 2020 ), preferred features ( Pickering, Walden-Schreiner, Barros, & Rossi, 2020 ), and perceived ecosystem services ( Alieva et al, 2021 , Fox et al, 2021 , Gosal and Ziv, 2020 , Rossi et al, 2020 , Yoshimura and Hiura, 2017 ). Although the approach can reveal certain places and features that are valued by visitors, photo-sharing social media is limited in further information about specific subjective values ( Schrammeijer, van Zanten, & Verburg, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specificity of information that can be elicited from qualitative content of social media depends on what and how the content is analyzed. Multiple studies have used images posted on photo-sharing social media platforms (e.g., Flickr and Instagram) to investigate parks and landscape experiences ( Callau, Albert, Rota, & Giné, 2019 ; P. Chang and Olafsson, 2022 , Conti and Lexhagen, 2020 ), preferred features ( Pickering, Walden-Schreiner, Barros, & Rossi, 2020 ), and perceived ecosystem services ( Alieva et al, 2021 , Fox et al, 2021 , Gosal and Ziv, 2020 , Rossi et al, 2020 , Yoshimura and Hiura, 2017 ). Although the approach can reveal certain places and features that are valued by visitors, photo-sharing social media is limited in further information about specific subjective values ( Schrammeijer, van Zanten, & Verburg, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of social media data may be subject to biases introduced by user groups (Langemeyer et al, 2018). Users of different social media sites have different motivations for uploading posts (Fox et al, 2021b), while education, gender, age and access to technology can also influence who is posting geotagged images (Clemente et al, 2019). Though different sites have different user groups and motivations for use, this study, as with the many studies that also only use one website, only reflect the opinions of one group of people (Wilkins et al, 2021).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Here, social media datasets, such as those from Flickr, Twitter, and Reddit, are an invaluable resource, due to their high spatiotemporal resolution and the relative ease with which they can be obtained (Fox et al, 2020a). In particular, social media datasets are effective at assessing a range of cultural ecosystem services including aesthetic appeal (Figueroa-Alfaro and Tang, 2017;Van Berkel et al, 2018;Johnson et al, 2019); recreational activities (Mancini et al, 2018;Graham and Eigenbrod, 2019;Fox et al, 2021a); spiritual and religious beliefs (Thiagarajah et al, 2015;Fox et al, 2021b); and identifying trends in geoeducation and geoconservation at tourist attractions (Németh et al, 2021b). However, not all social media posts are related to CES, for example, posts may not pertain to interactions with nature (e.g., photographs of food, text posts about a film), and where posts are about interactions with nature, they may not reflect a positive relationship (e.g., a picture of a fallen tree accompanied text post about damage from a flood).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have predominantly used data from Flickr (e.g. Graham & Eigenbrod, 2019; Lee et al, 2019; Mancini et al, 2019), as well as other platforms such as Reddit (Fox et al, 2021), Instagram (Grzyb et al, 2021) and Twitter (Tenkanen et al, 2017). Social media data has, for example, been used for studying drivers of outdoor recreation (Graham & Eigenbrod, 2019) and for understanding visitation patterns to national parks and protected areas (Wilkins et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%