2022
DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.751629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redefining and Validating Digital Biomarkers as Fluid, Dynamic Multi-Dimensional Digital Signal Patterns

Abstract: “Digital biomarker” is a term broadly and indiscriminately applied and often limited in its conceptualization to mimic well-established biomarkers as defined and approved by regulatory agencies such as the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). There is a practical urgency to revisit the definition of a digital biomarker and expand it beyond current methods of identification and validation. Restricting the promise of digital technologies within the realm of currently defined biomarkers creates a mis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This broad definition of digital biomarkers that is not limited to only correlated digital versions of traditional biomarkers has been criticized for diverging too far from a measurement taken directly in the body ( 14 ). Others, however, have advocated for collaboration with regulatory bodies to define different types (e.g., actively/passively acquired, point-in-time/continuous) or classes (e.g., direct/indirect, existing/novel) of digital biomarkers that could enable corresponding validation pathways ( 15 ). We prefer the broader definition of digital biomarkers.…”
Section: The Promise Of Digital Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This broad definition of digital biomarkers that is not limited to only correlated digital versions of traditional biomarkers has been criticized for diverging too far from a measurement taken directly in the body ( 14 ). Others, however, have advocated for collaboration with regulatory bodies to define different types (e.g., actively/passively acquired, point-in-time/continuous) or classes (e.g., direct/indirect, existing/novel) of digital biomarkers that could enable corresponding validation pathways ( 15 ). We prefer the broader definition of digital biomarkers.…”
Section: The Promise Of Digital Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that some digital phenotypers stretch the biomarker term even further-that is, any kind of digitized data, not only physiological or behavioral data, can become a biomarker (Au et al, 2021). Accordingly, several researchers have used Internet search activity (Birnbaum et al, 2020), social media posts (Adler et al, 2022), geo-location data (Fraccaro et al, 2019), and computer or mobile-device gaming (Johannes Dechant et al, 2021) to derive digital biomarkers of mental health.…”
Section: What Is "Bio" In Biomarkers?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the tenuous use of the extended phenotype concept, the use of the term “digital biomarkers” presents a more difficult case to criticize. First, because the use of the parent term “biomarker” has not been very consistent in the literature (Califf, 2018), one might also expect inconsistency in the use of the term “digital biomarker.” Second, discussions of what is meant by digital biomarkers are still ongoing, with some authors advocating more stringent use of the term (Au et al, 2021; Babrak et al, 2019; Montag et al, 2021a). Despite these caveats, what I seek to show is that current definitions and uses of “digital biomarker” involve a significant shift in what “bio” in biomarker is taken to denote—specifically, that “bio” now denotes “marker of biology,” including any digital markers of biology, rather than, as before, “marker derived from biology,” such as a biomolecule.…”
Section: Digital Biomarkers: Redefining a Biological Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the power of ML systems to detect anomalies in continuous signals [ 111 ], software programs that learn a patient’s unique physiologic patterns from wearable or implantable sensors may lead the way for personalized warning systems during experimental drug trials. Additionally, ML models can learn entirely new patterns from standardly collected data, giving rise to a new generation of digital biomarkers [ 112 , 113 ], to monitor treatment responses. Automated systems may learn to detect these biomarkers from a singular data source (e.g., electrocardiogram) or from combinations of multiple modalities (e.g., pulse oximetry, skin conductance, and blood glucose) to maximize the amount of information used for decision-making.…”
Section: Ai and Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%