2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redefining breast cancer subtypes to guide treatment prioritization and maximize response: Predictive biomarkers across 10 cancer therapies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
164
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
164
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study identified the third-generation subtype classification of breast cancer patients based on treatment responses 42 . In the present study, we used c-Jun downstream signals to further classify the subtypes of luminal breast cancer and their clinical prognoses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study identified the third-generation subtype classification of breast cancer patients based on treatment responses 42 . In the present study, we used c-Jun downstream signals to further classify the subtypes of luminal breast cancer and their clinical prognoses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pretreatment DWI-derived ADC maps and manual tumor segmentations were retrieved for radiomics model development. Pathologic complete response (pCR), which is the binary outcome assessing the absence of invasive disease in breast and lymph nodes at the time of surgery [17], was used as the prediction endpoint. We adopted the same train-test split as the BMMR2 challenge with 60% (n=117) randomly chosen as the training set and the remaining 40% (n=74) set as the testing set.…”
Section: A Patient Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the data employed in the study has been obtained from publicly available databases 24,25,[40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] . All the accession numbers are available in Supplementary Table 1.…”
Section: Supplementary Figure Legendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These agnostic approaches generate robust classifiers from diverse and complex data types, such as imaging, clinical, histology, and molecular profiling 22,23 . Here, we employed machine learning to construct and evaluate gene expression-based signatures that efficiently predict pCR to ICI plus chemotherapy in patients with primary TNBC treated in the phase II/III I-SPY2 clinical trial 24,25 . Thus, we constructed and tested a TNBC ICI response (TNBC-ICI) predictive classifier that involved 37 genes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%