2019
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.15600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redefining Heart Failure With a Reduced Ejection Fraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
43
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…36 Our approach allowed us to examine the effects of 10% decrements in LVEF, since some investigators have debated the appropriate cutoff values of ejection fraction especially in the context of HF. 37 All echocardiographic sites were tertiary academic hospitals. Rural sites or community-based echocardiographic labs were not represented in this cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Our approach allowed us to examine the effects of 10% decrements in LVEF, since some investigators have debated the appropriate cutoff values of ejection fraction especially in the context of HF. 37 All echocardiographic sites were tertiary academic hospitals. Rural sites or community-based echocardiographic labs were not represented in this cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical records for suspected events were retrieved, and hospitalizations for HF and myocardial infarctions (MI) were confirmed by trained clinicians following published guidelines [13][14][15]. Using hospital records from confirmed HF hospitalizations, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was classified as reduced (LVEF < 50% or qualitative report of abnormal LVEF) or preserved (LVEF ≥ 50% or qualitative report of normal LVEF) [16]. Hospitalizations for stroke events were confirmed by a panel of neurologists following the World Health Organization definition [17].…”
Section: Outcomes Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), the portion of blood pumped out by the left ventricle with each contraction, is one of the most important measurements in diagnosing and defining stages of HF. 37 Under the definitions provided by the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, 38 EF measurements are classified into 4 categories: normal (EF >51% in men and EF >53% in women), mildly abnormal (EF between 41%–51% in men and 41%–53% in women), moderately abnormal (EF within 30%–40% in men and women), and severely abnormal (EF <30% in men and women). EF severity may be reflected in HF patients’ changing conditions such as shortness of breath and reduced ability for physical activity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%