2012
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3352.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redescription and neotype designation of Lobogynium sudhiri (Datta) (Acari: Diplogyniidae), a mite associated with beetles of the genus Atholus (Thomson) (Coleoptera: Histeridae) in the Palaearctic region

Abstract: Ophiocelaeno sudhiri Datta, 1985 (family Diplogyniidae) is transferred to the genus Lobogynium Trägårdh, 1950 and rede-scribed from specimens collected in close association with histerid beetles of the genus Atholus (Thomson) in Europe and Asia.The genus Lobogynium is redefined and a key to the species is presented. The first description of the female, detailed redescrip-tion of the male and the new combination Lobogynium sudhiri (Datta, 1985) comb. nov. are given. A neotype is designated forthis species, beca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mesostigmata mites were identified, if possible, to the species level. Identification of species was done by the first and third authors (acarologists) using available literature including the original descriptions of the species (Berlese 1887 , 1904a , 1904b , 1906 , 1918 ; Bregetova et al 1973 ; Costa 1966 , 1967 , 1968 ; Evans and Browning 1956 ; Evans and Hyatt 1963 ; Evans et al 1961 ; Evans and Till 1979 ; Farrier and Hennessey 1993 ; Filipponi and Pegazzano 1962 , 1963 ; Furman 1972 ; Halliday 2000 ; Hirschmann and Wiśniewski 1982 ; Hirschmann et al 1991 ; Hughes 1976 ; Hyatt 1980 ; Hyatt and Emberson 1988 ; Karg 1962 , 1989 ; Kazemi et al 2014 ; Krantz 1962 ; Ma and Wang 1996 ; Niogret et al 2007 ; Plumari and Kazemi 2012 ; Samšiňák 1964 ; Skorupski and Witaliński 1997 ; Witaliński 2017 ; Yao et al 2019 ). The collected specimens (adults and identifiable nymphs, of which mainly deutonymphs were collected) were deposited in the Insect and Mite Collection of Ahvaz (IMCA), Department of plant protection, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, except Parasitus sp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesostigmata mites were identified, if possible, to the species level. Identification of species was done by the first and third authors (acarologists) using available literature including the original descriptions of the species (Berlese 1887 , 1904a , 1904b , 1906 , 1918 ; Bregetova et al 1973 ; Costa 1966 , 1967 , 1968 ; Evans and Browning 1956 ; Evans and Hyatt 1963 ; Evans et al 1961 ; Evans and Till 1979 ; Farrier and Hennessey 1993 ; Filipponi and Pegazzano 1962 , 1963 ; Furman 1972 ; Halliday 2000 ; Hirschmann and Wiśniewski 1982 ; Hirschmann et al 1991 ; Hughes 1976 ; Hyatt 1980 ; Hyatt and Emberson 1988 ; Karg 1962 , 1989 ; Kazemi et al 2014 ; Krantz 1962 ; Ma and Wang 1996 ; Niogret et al 2007 ; Plumari and Kazemi 2012 ; Samšiňák 1964 ; Skorupski and Witaliński 1997 ; Witaliński 2017 ; Yao et al 2019 ). The collected specimens (adults and identifiable nymphs, of which mainly deutonymphs were collected) were deposited in the Insect and Mite Collection of Ahvaz (IMCA), Department of plant protection, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, except Parasitus sp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Family Diplogyniidae Trägårdh, 1941Genus Lobogynium Trägårdh, 1950 Diagnosis (adults). See Plumari and Kazemi (2012).…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The species L. sudhiri was first collected from cow dung in India and described as Ophiocelaeno sudhiri on the basis of one male (Datta 1985). Plumari and Kazemi (2012) redescribed the species based on specimens collected from Iran, Italy, Hungary and Slovakia. Between these specimens and the original description, some detailed differences of structure were observed.…”
Section: Materials Examinedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The suborder Trigynaspida comprises about 350 mite species from 27 families that are mostly associated with arthropods in subtropical to tropical habitats (Lindquist et al 2009;Beaulieu et al 2011). Reflecting this habitat preference, about 25 species from eight families have been recorded from Europe (e.g., Silvestri 1912;Bregetova 1977;Kinn 1991;Wisniewski & Hirschmann 1992;Khaustov 1997Khaustov , 1999Gwiazdowicz 2002;Moraza et al 2008;Kim & Castagnoli 2010;Trach 2011Trach , 2013Plumari & Kazemi 2012). Five families of Trigynaspida have been recorded from Ukraine: Antennophoridae, Celaenopsidae, Cercomegistidae, Diplogyniidae and Parantennulidae (Bregetova 1977;Khaustov 1997Khaustov , 1999Trach 2011Trach , 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%