2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejop.2014.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redescription of Atopospira galeata (Kahl, 1927) nov. comb. and A. violacea (Kahl, 1926) nov. comb. with redefinition of Atopospira Jankowski, 1964 nov. stat. and Brachonella Jankowski, 1964 (Ciliophora, Armophorida)

Abstract: This is an author-produced, peer-reviewed version of this article. The final, definitive version of this document can be found online at European Journal of Protistology, published by Elsevier. Copyright restrictions may apply. doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2014.05.004 2 AbstractThe taxonomy of the Metopidae (Ciliophora, Armophorida) remains poorly understood since most of its members have not been studied by modern morphologic and molecular methods. Recent molecular investigations have indicated that the two most sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identification followed Kahl (), Foissner and Agatha (), Foissner et al. (), Bourland and Wendell (), and Vďačný and Foissner ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Identification followed Kahl (), Foissner and Agatha (), Foissner et al. (), Bourland and Wendell (), and Vďačný and Foissner ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…). Specifically, Atopospira Jankowski can be clearly defined by the bipartition of the adoral zone (Bourland and Wendell ), Brachonella Jankowski by the spiralization of the adoral zone around the entire body and posteriorization of the cytostome (Bourland and Wendell ; Bourland et al. ), Urostomides Jankowski by a four‐rowed perizonal stripe (Bourland et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(). However, these two species can be easily distinguished by their body sizes (65–90 × 30–50 μm vs. 30–55 × 18–35 μm), the numbers of somatic kineties (18–21 vs. 12–15) and adoral polykinetids (21–29 vs. 13–19), the distributional pattern of cortical granules (scattered vs. dense), and the accumulation of cytoplasmic granules in the preoral dome (present vs. absent); the latter is an important feature for delimiting Metopus species (Bourland and Wendell ; Bourland et al. ; Foissner et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEMBERS of the ciliate genus Metopus Claparède and Lachmann, 1858 are widely distributed in anaerobic and microaerobic freshwater, terrestrial, and marine habitats (Bourland and Wendell ; Bourland et al. , ; Corliss ; Da Silva‐Neto et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). Details on fine structure of armophoreans, which might provide important data for tracing homologies, are only known for a few species (for a review, see Lynn ), and in addition, molecular data available to propose phylogenetic hypotheses is also relatively scarce when compared to other ciliate classes (Bourland and Wendell ; da Silva Paiva et al. ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%