2012
DOI: 10.14411/fp.2012.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redescription of Eimeria dorcadis Mantovani, 1966 (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) from the dorcas gazelle (Gazella dorcas) in Saudi Arabia

Abstract: Eimeria dorcadis Mantovani, 1966 is redescribed from dorcas gazelle (Gazella dorcas (l.)) from saudi Arabia. Oocysts were detected in 7 out of 22 faecal samples (32%) using floatation method. The sporulated oocysts are cylindrical, slightly flattened at the micropylar pole, measure in average 32 × 19 μm (27-36 × 16-24 μm), length/width ratio being 1.7 (1.5-2.1). Oocyst wall is 1.2 μm thick, smooth, double-layered; outer layer is slightly thicker, light blue in colour; inner layer brownish, with micropyle in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eimeria dorcadis Mantovani, 1966 was first described by Mantovani (1966) and the original description was devoid of Stieda body. Mohammed et al (2012) redescribed the species with a visible Stieda body which goes well with the findings from all mammalian eimerian parasites which possess Stieda body. Therefore, it may be likely that reinvestigating of E. trichechi may result in demonstrating the presence of Stieda body and also investigating their phylogenetic relationship with relevant eimerian parasites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Eimeria dorcadis Mantovani, 1966 was first described by Mantovani (1966) and the original description was devoid of Stieda body. Mohammed et al (2012) redescribed the species with a visible Stieda body which goes well with the findings from all mammalian eimerian parasites which possess Stieda body. Therefore, it may be likely that reinvestigating of E. trichechi may result in demonstrating the presence of Stieda body and also investigating their phylogenetic relationship with relevant eimerian parasites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The presence or absence of a micropylar cap, the diameters of the oocyst and the form of the oocysts are valid criteria for differentiating Eimeria species (32). Four species of Eimeria were detected in this study according to the morphological characterization and measurements of oocyst.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Even, its absence in E. cylindrica and E. zuernii assisted in the identification. In E. bovis, the spacing between the inner and outer layers of the oocyst and the absence of shading between these two layers in (Mohammed et al 2012), since it is functionally unlikely that there is a discontinuity in the inner layer of an oocyst (Berto et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%