2003
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02762003000800015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redescription of Nyssomyia intermedia (Lutz & Neiva, 1912) and Nyssomyia neivai (Pinto, 1926) (Diptera: Psychodidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Carlos Brisola Marcondes [ were corroborated by other authors 4 . Almost all researchers working in the fi eld of entomology have accepted this distinction between the species.…”
Section: Defense Of Taxonomy a Sisyphus Task?supporting
confidence: 57%
“…Carlos Brisola Marcondes [ were corroborated by other authors 4 . Almost all researchers working in the fi eld of entomology have accepted this distinction between the species.…”
Section: Defense Of Taxonomy a Sisyphus Task?supporting
confidence: 57%
“…intermedia and 4.1/100,000 specimens of Ny. neivai), showed that these two species cross naturally, but curiously each one conserves its identity as regards the male and females genital characters, apex of the ejaculatory ducts and spermathecae respectively, as described by Andrade Filho et al (2003). However, artificial crosses between the two species should be attempted in order to evaluate pre-mating isolation mechanisms and the fitness, fertility and morphological characteristics of the F1 offspring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The captures were carried out monthly by two different techniques: the first using automatic light traps (Natal et al 1991) modified as follows: they have a nobreak battery (6 volts and 12 amperes) as energy source and an external collection chamber linked to the body of the trap by a sleeve, and the second using modified black and white Shannon traps (Galati et al 2001) Samples of specimens captured with automatic light and Shannon traps were dissected to investigate natural infection, as described by Galati et al (2003a). The remainder of the specimens captured, after being killed with chloroform, were conditioned in Petri dishes and kept under refrigeration until their clarification by the method described by Forattini (1973) and their identification according to Galati (2003b), redescription of some species (Andrade Filho et al 2003) and descriptions of new species of the area (Galati et al , 2006Shimabukuro et al 2007). A sample of these specimens is deposited in the collection of the Departamento de Epidemiologia of the Faculdade de Saúde Pública, USP.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the laboratory, phlebotominae were separated from other insects and then were clarified and mounted for identification. The determination to species level according was made with the key of Young and Duncan [4], modified by Filho et al [22] to Lu. neivai .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%