2006
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1310.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redescription of Tetramorium forte Forel, 1904 (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae), a western Mediterranean ant species

Abstract: The western Mediterranean ant species Tetramorium forte Forel, 1904 is redescribed and a lectotype is designated. Taxonomic controversy surrounding the application of the name and its synonymy is thereby resolved: T. ruginode Stitz, 1917 (with its junior synonym T. hispanicum Bondroit, 1918), T. maurum tingitanum Santschi, 1929 and T. maroccanum De Haro & Collingwood, 1994 are relegated to synonymy with T. forte. Lectotypes are designated for T. hispanicum, T. maurum tingitanum, T. maroccanum and T. silves… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We included in our checklist the species Tetramorium pyrenaeicum Röszler, 1936. This species was first described in Andorra and elevated to species rank by Röszler (1951) (Güsten et al 2006). However, because its morphological characters do not correspond to any European Tetramorium species currently described and because no biological material remains in their original depositories (Muzeul Brukenthal, Sibiu, Romania and Zoologisches Museum der Universität Hamburg, Germany), Güsten et al (2006) consider that the validity of Tetramorium pyrenaeicum as a taxonomically distinct species remains controversial.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We included in our checklist the species Tetramorium pyrenaeicum Röszler, 1936. This species was first described in Andorra and elevated to species rank by Röszler (1951) (Güsten et al 2006). However, because its morphological characters do not correspond to any European Tetramorium species currently described and because no biological material remains in their original depositories (Muzeul Brukenthal, Sibiu, Romania and Zoologisches Museum der Universität Hamburg, Germany), Güsten et al (2006) consider that the validity of Tetramorium pyrenaeicum as a taxonomically distinct species remains controversial.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This species was first described in Andorra and elevated to species rank by Röszler (1951) (Güsten et al 2006). However, because its morphological characters do not correspond to any European Tetramorium species currently described and because no biological material remains in their original depositories (Muzeul Brukenthal, Sibiu, Romania and Zoologisches Museum der Universität Hamburg, Germany), Güsten et al (2006) consider that the validity of Tetramorium pyrenaeicum as a taxonomically distinct species remains controversial. Nonetheless, we chose to retain this species in our list because the possibility exists that it could actually be a taxonomically distinct species, such as Tetramorium D or Tetramorium E described by Schlick-Steiner et al (2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, all measurements are expressed in mm to two decimal places. The measurements and indices used in this study follow Bolton (1975, 1979, 1980), Güsten et al (2006), and Hita Garcia and Fisher (2011, 2012a, 2012b, 2013):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complicate taxonomic history of this species was resolved recently by Csősz et al 2007 (for some more details see also Radchenko et al 1998, Czechowski et al 2002, Güsten et al 2006). …”
Section: Cataloguementioning
confidence: 99%