2015 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iscas.2015.7169048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redesigning commercial floating-gate memory for analog computing applications

Abstract: Abstract-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2b, by connecting the erase gates of all cells of one column with an additional line, while eliminating the row lines connecting these gates. (Note that this redesign is different from the one performed by our group earlier [8] with the 180 nm ESF1 technology, because of a different structure of its supercells. )…”
Section: B Array Modification and Cell Tuningmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…2b, by connecting the erase gates of all cells of one column with an additional line, while eliminating the row lines connecting these gates. (Note that this redesign is different from the one performed by our group earlier [8] with the 180 nm ESF1 technology, because of a different structure of its supercells. )…”
Section: B Array Modification and Cell Tuningmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For this purpose, NOR memory arrays developed with a 180 nm technology by Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. (SST) [52] are chosen in refs. [53][54][55][56]. The basic memory cell, as depicted in Figure 7a, features a highly asymmetric structure presenting a floating gate only near the source side, with the gate stack at the drain side made only of the tunneling oxide.…”
Section: Memory Transistors As Synaptic Devices In Artificial Neural mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among different candidates, the resistive switching memories, including phase change and conductive bridge memories, and metaloxide memristors (also known as ReRAM or RRAM [31]) are perhaps the most promising due to their excellent scaling prospects. Their technology, however, is still in need of improvement, which is less of a problem for another excellent candidate, floating gate (FG) memories, e.g., those based on redesigned commercial-grade-embedded NOR flash [22], [32], [33]. Though planar FG cells are less dense than passively integrated memristors, their main advantage is FG cell amplification, which simplifies and reduces the overhead of peripheral circuitry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%