2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redesigning TRACER trial after TRITON

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The “good news” is that vorapaxar per se can be most definitely exonerated from the harm observed for stroke prevention, and especially from alarming ICH numbers. 14 The bad news is that vorapaxar has been approved in May 2014, but it’s clinical utilization is still very low, or even not existing in many remote from US markets. It seems that despite the heavy expense of investing in two mega trials, it is challenging to test vorapaxar as a monotherapy in another head-to-head stroke prevention study against clopidogrel and extended-released dipyridamole.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The “good news” is that vorapaxar per se can be most definitely exonerated from the harm observed for stroke prevention, and especially from alarming ICH numbers. 14 The bad news is that vorapaxar has been approved in May 2014, but it’s clinical utilization is still very low, or even not existing in many remote from US markets. It seems that despite the heavy expense of investing in two mega trials, it is challenging to test vorapaxar as a monotherapy in another head-to-head stroke prevention study against clopidogrel and extended-released dipyridamole.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%