2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rediscovering the lost archaeological landscape of southern New England using airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
63
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the earliest applications of airborne LiDAR to archaeology focused on the 18th-century plantation landscape of Maryland: the results of mapping at Tulip Hall and Wye Hall revealed traces of historical gardens, outbuildings, and pathways that conveyed a much more intricate landscape and dynamic built environment than previously detected by standard archaeological methods (Harmon et al 2006). As in our own work on Montserrat, the combination of LiDAR analysis, pedestrian survey, and other archaeological data sources to locate previously unknown sites has been productive in the forests of southern New England (Johnson and Ouimet 2014), in the piedmont area surrounding the Mesoamerican site of Izapa in Chiapas, Mexico (Rosenswig et al 2013), and in the investigation of archaic shell mounds on the St. John's River in Florida (Randall 2014). Recent adjustments to standard classification approaches in the FrancheComte region of France have improved the ability to distinguish standing architecture from surrounding vegetation in LiDAR visualizations (Opitz and Nuninger 2014).…”
Section: Airborne Lidar and Landscape Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…One of the earliest applications of airborne LiDAR to archaeology focused on the 18th-century plantation landscape of Maryland: the results of mapping at Tulip Hall and Wye Hall revealed traces of historical gardens, outbuildings, and pathways that conveyed a much more intricate landscape and dynamic built environment than previously detected by standard archaeological methods (Harmon et al 2006). As in our own work on Montserrat, the combination of LiDAR analysis, pedestrian survey, and other archaeological data sources to locate previously unknown sites has been productive in the forests of southern New England (Johnson and Ouimet 2014), in the piedmont area surrounding the Mesoamerican site of Izapa in Chiapas, Mexico (Rosenswig et al 2013), and in the investigation of archaic shell mounds on the St. John's River in Florida (Randall 2014). Recent adjustments to standard classification approaches in the FrancheComte region of France have improved the ability to distinguish standing architecture from surrounding vegetation in LiDAR visualizations (Opitz and Nuninger 2014).…”
Section: Airborne Lidar and Landscape Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As a result of this funding, NCALM was subcontracted to record 200 km The usefulness of LiDAR as an archaeological survey tool was first established in temperate forested landscapes [25][26][27]. LiDAR has been used to identify archaeological remains in forested areas in Europe [28], Canada [29], and the Americas [30], although the ease of this identification varies with the kind of tree cover and the amount of modern disturbance [31][32][33]. It has subsequently become evident that LiDAR is also useful in tropical forested landscapes, as has been shown in the point cloud that was produced around Caracol, Belize [20,34,35], the piedmont zone of Chiapas, Mexico [36], and Angkor, Cambodia [37].…”
Section: Caracol Lidar Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hysteresis is used to track along the remaining pixels that have not been suppressed. For thresholding, the magnitude of an edge was computed by Equation (9). Hysteresis uses two thresholds (T1 and T2, satisfying T1 < T2) and if the magnitude was below the first threshold, it was set to zero (made a non-edge).…”
Section: Edge Detection: Canny Edge Detector (Ced)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil marks can appear on bare soil changing in color, shape, or texture [1,2]. In order to identify these buried archaeological features, different types of remote sensing imagery have been used including aerial photographs [1,3,4], spaceborne and airborne RADAR images [5][6][7], airborne LIDAR images [8,9], as well as imaging spectroscopy [10][11][12][13]. Recently, archaeologists interested in detecting archaeological features are increasingly employing very high resolution (VHR) commercial satellite imagery [14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%