1989
DOI: 10.2307/2073157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

40
951
2
52

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,812 publications
(1,045 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
40
951
2
52
Order By: Relevance
“…Our argument is further supported by findings in social categorization theory, which delineates how through in-group/out-group categorization ("we" and "they") general preferences are being formed and differences stressed (Turner et al, 1987;Dovidio et al, 2007). These preferences and the distinction between in-group and out-group may function as a disease avoidance mechanism that makes individuals shun unfamiliar foods which belong to an out-group, as those food products may host unfamiliar pathogens and hence could pose a potential threat to one's health ( Johnson et al, 2011;Schaller, 2011;Schaller & Neuberg, 2012;Terrizzi et al, 2013).…”
Section: Consumer Ethnocentrism and Domestic Food Choicesupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our argument is further supported by findings in social categorization theory, which delineates how through in-group/out-group categorization ("we" and "they") general preferences are being formed and differences stressed (Turner et al, 1987;Dovidio et al, 2007). These preferences and the distinction between in-group and out-group may function as a disease avoidance mechanism that makes individuals shun unfamiliar foods which belong to an out-group, as those food products may host unfamiliar pathogens and hence could pose a potential threat to one's health ( Johnson et al, 2011;Schaller, 2011;Schaller & Neuberg, 2012;Terrizzi et al, 2013).…”
Section: Consumer Ethnocentrism and Domestic Food Choicesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Domestic and foreign food products also evoke different healthiness perceptions (Gineikiene et al, 2016). Gineikiene et al (2016) proposed social categorization theory (Turner et al, 1987) as a tool to explain this healthiness bias, when domestic products are perceived to be healthier than foreign ones, suggesting that domestic products are perceived as belonging to the in-group and categorized with the self, whereas foreign products are seen as belonging to the outgroup. Therefore, people tend to identify more with domestic rather than foreign products (Gineikiene et al, 2016).…”
Section: Health Consciousness and Domestic Food Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sharedness is an essential and inseparable part of one's personal self-concept (Fredman et al, 2015;Swann & Buhrmester, 2015;Whitehouse, McQuinn, Buhrmester, & Swann, 2014). The fusion construct emerged from Social Identity Theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979; Turner, Oakes, Alexander Haslam, & McGarty, 1994;Willer et al, 1989) which focuses primarily on the strength of ties to a collective identity, where the group and self are conceived of as being in a hydraulic relationship (for review: (Whitehouse & Lanman, 2014). A number of studies have validated of the identity fusion construct, and demonstrated that it can be reliably distinguished from group identification, despite sharing some common elements (Bortolini, Newson, Natividade, Vázquez, & Gómez, 2018).…”
Section: Identity Fusion Meaning Making and Pro-group Commitmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culture-relevance is an extension of self-relevance (Hong, Ip, Chiu, Morris, & Menon, 2001;Hong, Morris, Chiu, & Benet-Martinez, 2000). Both Social Identity Theory and Social Categorization Theory (Ashforth & Mael, 1989;Tajfel & Turner, 1979;Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher, & Wetherell, 1987) assert that individuals define themselves not only by individuated identity but also by collective social identity, such as group membership, ethnicity, and culture. Individuals also spontaneously tend to categorize social information into different social categories (e.g., ingroup and outgroup based on their group membership), and highlight the boundaries between social categories (Brewer, 1991;Turner & Reynolds, 2010).…”
Section: Cultural Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%