2006
DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1449:rtsicp]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rediscovering the Species in Community-Wide Predictive Modeling

Abstract: Broadening the scope of conservation efforts to protect entire communities provides several advantages over the current species-specific focus, yet ecologists have been hampered by the fact that predictive modeling of multiple species is not directly amenable to traditional statistical approaches. Perhaps the greatest hurdle in community-wide modeling is that communities are composed of both co-occurring groups of species and species arranged independently along environmental gradients. Therefore, commonly use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous applications include the modeling of species distributions (Mastrorillo et al 1997;Ö zesmi and Ö zesmi 1999), species diversity (Guégan et al 1998;Brosse et al 2001;Olden et al 2006b), community composition (Olden et al 2006a), and aquatic primary and secondary production (Scardi and Harding Results from the regression tree for predicting fish species richness as a function of environmental characteristics for 8236 north-temperate lakes in Ontario, Canada. (A) 10-fold cross-validation (solid circles) and resubstitution (empty circles) relative error for the regression tree.…”
Section: Classification and Regression Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous applications include the modeling of species distributions (Mastrorillo et al 1997;Ö zesmi and Ö zesmi 1999), species diversity (Guégan et al 1998;Brosse et al 2001;Olden et al 2006b), community composition (Olden et al 2006a), and aquatic primary and secondary production (Scardi and Harding Results from the regression tree for predicting fish species richness as a function of environmental characteristics for 8236 north-temperate lakes in Ontario, Canada. (A) 10-fold cross-validation (solid circles) and resubstitution (empty circles) relative error for the regression tree.…”
Section: Classification and Regression Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANNs also provide a much more flexible way of modeling ecological data. Model complexity can be varied by altering the transfer function or the inner architecture of the network through an increase in the number of hidden neurons or layers to enhance data fitting, or by increasing the number of output neurons to model multiple ecological response variables, such as multiple species (e.g., Ö zesmi and Ö zesmi 1999) or entire communities (e.g., Olden 2003;Olden et al 2006a). It is this flexibility that has likely led to the increased popularity of neural networks in ecology.…”
Section: Strengths and Weaknessesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joy & Death (2004) predicted the occurrence of 14 species of fish and crustaceans taking into account up to 31 driving variables. Similarly, Olden (2003) predicted the occurrence of 27 fishes considering 9 physical variables, whereas Olden et al (2006) used 24 variables to infer the occurrence of 16 fish species. Other applications in aquatic ecology different from the prediction of species abundances or occurrences are reported in this paragraph.…”
Section: Multilayer Perceptron (Mlp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hoped such findings would call attention to the need for species-level analysis during community-level investigations, regardless of whether TITAN or other appropriate analytical techniques are used. The surge of recent papers on species distribution modeling for enhancing bioassessment supports this view (e.g., Olden et al 2006, Elith and Leathwick 2009, Esselman and Allan 2011. If a better approach exists for linking community and species-level analyses, we suspect it does not involve fitting a population of candidate threshold regression models to each species distribution within a sampled assemblage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%