2011
DOI: 10.1894/n10-rje-08.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rediscovery of the Headwater Catfish Ictalurus lupus (Ictaluridae) in a Western Gulf-Slope Drainage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mitochondrial Cytochrome B gene (mt‐CytB) was sequenced and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the nuclear recombination activating 2 gene (nuc‐RAG2) were resolved. Cytochrome B typically provides unambiguous species identification (Ketmaier & Bianco, 2015) and was previously used in studies of Headwater catfish (Bean et al., 2011; McClure‐Baker et al., 2010). Cytochrome B was amplified and bi‐directionally sequenced using primers MT11 and MT29 (Waldbieser et al, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mitochondrial Cytochrome B gene (mt‐CytB) was sequenced and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the nuclear recombination activating 2 gene (nuc‐RAG2) were resolved. Cytochrome B typically provides unambiguous species identification (Ketmaier & Bianco, 2015) and was previously used in studies of Headwater catfish (Bean et al., 2011; McClure‐Baker et al., 2010). Cytochrome B was amplified and bi‐directionally sequenced using primers MT11 and MT29 (Waldbieser et al, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The native range of Headwater catfish includes the Rio Grande and Pecos River basins in the United States and Mexico (Hubbs et al, 2008). Although Headwater catfish was among the least studied North American freshwater fishes just a few decades ago (Gilbert & Burgess, 1980), subsequent studies showed its native distribution in the United States was declining as a result of habitat degradation and competition and introgression with Channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus Rafinesque, 1818 (Ictaluridae, Suliformes) beginning in the 1980s (Bean et al., 2011; Kelsch & Hendricks, 1990; McClure‐Baker et al., 2010). Channel catfish are native to streams east of the Rocky Mountains in North America but have been widely introduced across the United States.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species identified in published and unpublished literature were accepted as reported and revised according to Page et al (2013), although some species (e.g., Guadalupe Bass M. treculii: Bean et al 2013;Headwater Catfish Ictalurus lupus: McClure-Baker et al 2010;Bean et al 2011) are known to hybridize with congeners. Mean (±SD) number of fish per reach was 14,944 ± 61,188, and the median number of fish per reach was 4,082 (range = 89-453,147).…”
Section: Data Compilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean (±SD) number of fish per reach was 14,944 ± 61,188, and the median number of fish per reach was 4,082 (range = 89-453,147). Species identified in published and unpublished literature were accepted as reported and revised according to Page et al (2013), although some species (e.g., Guadalupe Bass M. treculii: Bean et al 2013; Headwater Catfish Ictalurus lupus: McClure-Baker et al 2010;Bean et al 2011) are known to hybridize with congeners. Species relative abundances were sorted into categories using the "ACFOR scale": abundant (>75% in relative abundance), common (50-74%), frequent (25-49%), occasional (5-24%), or rare (>0% to 4%; Kent and Coker 1992;Stiers et al 2011;Craig et al 2017).…”
Section: Data Compilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean (±SD) number of fi sh per reach was 14,944 ± 61,188, and the median number of fi sh per reach was 4,082 (range = 89-453,147). Species identifi ed in published and unpublished literature were accepted as reported and revised according to Page et al ( 2013 ), although some species (e.g., Guadalupe Bass M. treculii : Bean et al 2013 ; Headwater Catfi sh Ictalurus lupus : McClure-Baker et al 2010 ;Bean et al 2011 ) are known to hybridize with congeners. Species relative abundances were sorted into categories using the "ACFOR scale": abundant (>75% in relative abundance), common (50-74%), frequent (25-49%), occasional (5-24%), or rare (>0% to 4%; Kent and Coker 1992 ;Stiers et al 2011 ;Craig et al 2017 ).…”
Section: Data Compilationmentioning
confidence: 99%