2014
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbu033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rediscovery rate estimation for assessing the validation of significant findings in high-throughput studies

Abstract: It is common and advised practice in biomedical research to validate experimental or observational findings in a population different from the one where the findings were initially assessed. This practice increases the generalizability of the results and decreases the likelihood of reporting false-positive findings. Validation becomes critical when dealing with high-throughput experiments, where the large number of tests increases the chance to observe false-positive results. In this article, we review common … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Define Rt=i=1N1()|Tti|>c and Rv=i=1N1()|Tti|>c,|Tvi|>k, where c is a critical value in the training sample and k in the validation sample. Ganna et al , defined RDR as the expected proportion of statistically significant results in the training sample that can be validated, that is, RDR=E(Rv/RtRt>0). We now find a nonparametric representation for RDR, which shows its relationship to the FDR. Because FDR is a well‐known concept, this relationship is useful for understanding the RDR intuitively.…”
Section: A Nonparametric Approach To Estimating Rdrmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Define Rt=i=1N1()|Tti|>c and Rv=i=1N1()|Tti|>c,|Tvi|>k, where c is a critical value in the training sample and k in the validation sample. Ganna et al , defined RDR as the expected proportion of statistically significant results in the training sample that can be validated, that is, RDR=E(Rv/RtRt>0). We now find a nonparametric representation for RDR, which shows its relationship to the FDR. Because FDR is a well‐known concept, this relationship is useful for understanding the RDR intuitively.…”
Section: A Nonparametric Approach To Estimating Rdrmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Ganna et al , assumed T t i and T v i to be the t ‐statistics, but in this paper, we do not make such an assumption. Let n t 0 and n t 1 be the sample sizes of the control group and case group in the training sample; and similarly n v 0 and n v 1 in the validation sample.…”
Section: A Nonparametric Approach To Estimating Rdrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Analyses of single vitamin and nutrient supplement use were adjusted for multivitamin use. To account for multiple comparisons while also allowing for biomarker discovery and hypothesis generation, a false discovery rate (FDR) , 0.1 was applied (Benjamini-Hochberg procedure) (36,37). Diet-metabolite correlations first were ranked from smallest to highest P value.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%