2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1065-6995(03)00123-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redistribution of motor proteins by Cytochalasin J treatment

Abstract: In this study we extend our analysis of the effect of Cytochalasin J (CJ) on mitotic and interphase cells by the use of immunocytochemical techniques to localize antigens to anti-beta-tubulin, anti-dynein heavy chain (HC), anti-dynein intermediate chain (IC), and anti-kinesin antibodies following CJ treatment. Anti-dynein IC and HC staining of CJ treated cells showed a significant reduction in anti-dynein staining in the nuclear region of interphase cells. Monolayer cultures of PtK(1)cells treated with 10 micr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cytochalasin J is not a particularly potent cytochalasin (Cooper, 1987;Yarhara et al, 1982) yet it has the most significant effect on PtK 1 cells mitotic events when compared with similar concentrations of CB, CD, CE and CH (unpublished data). Cytochalasin J treatment of mitotic PtK 1 cells indicates its effects not only the microfilament (MF) system, but also the dynein complex (Robinson and Snyder, 2003). Since dynactin contains Arp1 and directly attaches to p150 Glued , it may also be sensitive to CJ treatment, particularly since the ''actin fold'' has a high homology with the ATP binding site with actin filaments (Kabsch and Holmes, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cytochalasin J is not a particularly potent cytochalasin (Cooper, 1987;Yarhara et al, 1982) yet it has the most significant effect on PtK 1 cells mitotic events when compared with similar concentrations of CB, CD, CE and CH (unpublished data). Cytochalasin J treatment of mitotic PtK 1 cells indicates its effects not only the microfilament (MF) system, but also the dynein complex (Robinson and Snyder, 2003). Since dynactin contains Arp1 and directly attaches to p150 Glued , it may also be sensitive to CJ treatment, particularly since the ''actin fold'' has a high homology with the ATP binding site with actin filaments (Kabsch and Holmes, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interphase cells revealed a localization of MTs emanating from the centrosome near the nucleus ( Fig. 1A; Robinson and Snyder 2003). However, when cells were fixed with PFA the MT array appeared fragmented with shorter and fewer MTs (Fig.…”
Section: Microtubules With Dapimentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Most hypotheses of force production focus solely on spindle microtubules and their motor proteins (Gorbsky et al, 1988;Nicklas, 1989;Desai et al, 1998;Sharp et el., 2000;LaFountain et al, 2004;Mitchison, 2005;Rogers et al, 2005;Rath et al, 2009). Others have considered components such as actin (Forer and Pickett-Heaps, 1998;Silverman-Gavrila and Forer, 2000;Forer, et al, 2003;Robinson and Snyder, 2003;Snyder et al, 2010), myosin 2005Forer, 2000, 2003;Rosenblatt et al, 2004;Woolner et al, 2008;Snyder et al, 2010;Rump et al, 2011), titin and spindle matrix proteins (Johansen and Johansen, 2007;Lince-Faria et al, 2009;Qi et al, 2009;Ding et al, 2009;Johansen et al, 2011 ). This article describes experiments that deal with the role of spindle myosin in anaphase chromosome movement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%