Redlining or risk? A spatial analysis of auto insurance rates in Los Angeles

Abstract

Auto insurance rates can vary dramatically, with much higher premiums in poor and minority areas than elsewhere, even after accounting for individual characteristics, driving history, and coverage. This paper uses a unique data set to examine the relative influence of place-based socioeconomic characteristics (or redlining) and place-based risk factors on the place-based component of automobile insurance premiums. We use a novel approach of combining tract-level census data and car insurance rate quotes from multiple companies for sub-areas within the city of Los Angeles. The quotes are for a hypothetical individual with identical demographic and auto characteristics, driving records, and insurance coverage. This method allows the individual demographic and driving record to be fixed. Multivariate models are then used to estimate the independent contributions of these risk and redlining factors to the place-based component of the car insurance premium. We find that both risk and redlining factors are associated with variations in insurance costs in the place-based component, with black and poor neighborhoods being adversely affected, although risk factors are stronger predictors. However, even after risk factors are taken into account in the model specification, SES factors remain statistically significant. Moreover, simulations show that redlining factors explain more of the gap in auto insurance premiums between black (and Latino) and white neighborhoods and between poor and nonpoor neighborhoods. The findings do not appear sensitive to the individual characteristics of the hypothetical driver. © 2007 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management

The effects on insurance costs of restricting undocumented immigrants' access to driver licenses

“…Markkula (2004) also noted that insurers may be more likely to deny service to minority and low-income customers, as well as drivers who were previously uninsured. However, one study that evaluated how the size of the minority population (percentage that is black or Latino), the percentage under the poverty line, and crime rates (among other variables) affected insurance premiums, found that any significance from ethnicity indicators may be due to an interaction with poverty indicators, for they found poverty had a larger coefficient (Ong and Stoll 2007). Hence we will include the poverty rate, but not race or ethnic indicators.…”

Discrimination Data Analysis: A Multi-disciplinary Bibliography

“…As an alternative, (Campbell et al, 2008) use proprietary data on unsecured debt. Other studies on redlining use house market data (Aalbers, 2007;Ezeala-Harrison et al, 2008), consumer credit card data (Brevoort, 2011;Cohen-Cole, 2009), and insurance data (Ong & Stoll, 2007;Ross & Tootell, 2004).…”

Algorithmic Equity: A Framework for Social Applications

“…However, one simulation study in the Los Angeles region found that covered insurance risks are indeed higher for people living in minority or low-socioeconomic status neighborhoods-but the difference in insurance premiums exceeds what is justified by the difference in risk (Ong and Stoll, 2007). A more recent study analyzed data on premium quotes and incurred insurance losses for states that kept ZIP code-level records of insurance payouts .…”