“…[1] Amongthe candidate materials, MOFs have been taken as inferior electrode materials for batteries under most occasions [2,3] except that they can playa ss elf-sacrificial templates andu pgrade the electrochemical performances of transition metal oxide/sulfide or carbonaceous materials by enlarging their specific surface areas and exposing greatly their activesites. [4][5][6][7][8] Recently,p ristine MOFs as electrode materials for LIBs have demonstrated high specific capacity.F or example, Cu-BTC, Co-BTC, Mn-BTC,F e-BTC( BTC = 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate), Fe-MIL-88B ([Fe 3 O(BDC) 3 (H 2 O) 2 (NO 3 )] n ,B DC = 1,4-benzenedicarboxy-late), Co-TDA (TDA = 2,5-thiophenedicarboxylate), Mn-BDC, Ni-BHC (BHC = 1,2,3,4,5,6-benzenehexacarboxylate), CoCOP (cobalt coordinationp olymer), Me 2 NH 2 M(HCOO) 3 /M(HCOO) 2 (Me = CH 3 ,M= Mn, Co, Ni)h ybrid composites as anode materials for LIBs can achieve ah igh reversible specific capacity broughtb ym ultiple-electron redox reactions, and intercalation-likes tructurald eformation. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Howeveri nt hese cases, the reported mechanism of lithium storage is controversial.…”