“…Anyhow, the different uptake or extrusion mechanisms and the broad and diverse range of substrate exchanged allow bacteria to quickly adapt to and colonize changing environments (Jeckelmann and Erni, 2020) Furthermore, several proteins that showed significant increases in the two polluted sites, AJO and MAT, are directly related to the defence against environmental stress (Fig. 6 and Supplementary Table 3), many of which have previously been shown to respond to environmental pollution, including dioxygenase (Sharma et al ., 2019), glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (Reyes‐Hernández et al ., 2009; Michán et al ., 2019), fructose‐biphosphate aldolase (Fernández‐Cisnal et al ., 2014, 2017; Michán et al ., 2019), cysteine synthase (Ding et al ., 2021), isocitrate dehydrogenase (Fernández‐Cisnal et al ., 2017), enolase (Puglisi et al ., 2010; Michán et al ., 2019), ATP‐dependent zinc metalloprotease FTSH (Tang et al ., 2016), catalase‐peroxidase (Puglisi et al ., 2010; Michán et al ., 2019), chlorite dismutase (Hofbauer et al ., 2014), thiosulfate sulfurtransferase (Michán et al ., 2019), peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase MsrA (Weissbach et al ., 2002), superoxide dismutase (Puglisi et al ., 2010; Fernández‐Cisnal et al ., 2014), FMN‐dependent oxidoreductase (Ellis, 2010; Puglisi et al ., 2010), aldehyde dehydrogenase (Puglisi et al ., 2010; Abril et al ., 2015), and so on. All these proteins contribute to detoxification processes, to defence against oxidative stress or repair of cell damage after exposure to xenobiotics.…”