2021
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202170126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redox Flow Batteries: Non‐Solvent Induced Phase Separation Enables Designer Redox Flow Battery Electrodes (Adv. Mater. 16/2021)

Abstract: Redox flow batteries have the potential to accelerate the transition to a green‐energy economy by integrating renewable technologies into the electrical grid. Their porous carbon electrodes need to balance the trade‐off between mass transport and kinetics. In article number 2006716, Antoni Forner‐Cuenca and co‐workers show that non‐solvent induced phase separation can be leveraged as a versatile and facile method for fabricating high‐surface‐area microstructures, with hierarchical porous architectures well‐sui… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 6, the current distribution profiles in one half-cell are plotted over the electrode thickness and length together with the normalized current values (normalized by the total current generated in the electrode). As observed for all cases, most of the current is generated near the membrane interface, driven by the high activation and mass transfer reaction overpotentials in that region as a result of greater species reaction rates [13,35,88,89] . Additionally, the current distribution depends on the fluid dynamics of the system which gives rise to different velocity profiles and species flux throughout the electrode volume.…”
Section: Electrochemical Performancesupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Figure 6, the current distribution profiles in one half-cell are plotted over the electrode thickness and length together with the normalized current values (normalized by the total current generated in the electrode). As observed for all cases, most of the current is generated near the membrane interface, driven by the high activation and mass transfer reaction overpotentials in that region as a result of greater species reaction rates [13,35,88,89] . Additionally, the current distribution depends on the fluid dynamics of the system which gives rise to different velocity profiles and species flux throughout the electrode volume.…”
Section: Electrochemical Performancesupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Despite the technological maturity and advantages of RFBs, their current elevated costs and limited power and energy density have challenged their market penetration and widespread implementation [9][10][11] . To increase cost competitiveness and system efficiency, research efforts address technology limitations through the development and engineering of high-performance materials [12][13][14][15][16] , alternative flow cell designs [17,18] , new electrolytes [9,19,20] and improved operational strategies [21][22][23] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sacrificial agents were also adopted in other techniques different from electrospinning. For instance, Wan et al [71] studied a polymer solution of Poly(vinylpyrrolidone) and PAN at different ratios in a non-solvent induced phase separation to synthesise a tuneable porous electrode (Figure 2g). The process is promising for an industrial process and allows the fine tuning of the porosity which is beneficial for the electrolyte transport in the electrode.…”
Section: Novel Carbon-based Mesoporous Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] Although these studies gained insights into the requirements of electrodes for RFB application (i.e., well-defined structure, bimodal PSD), the investigated commercial electrodes are repurposed fuel cell gas diffusion electrodes and are not optimized for their use in all-liquid RFBs. [4,20] In addition, the conventional manufacturing and functionalization methods mainly focus on the optimization of the microstructure, but the electrolyte distribution, electrode-electrolyte interface, and electrode conductivity remain unidentified. [13,21,22] Incomplete understanding of the structurefunction-performance relationships and the interplay between the electrode and other RFB components (including the flow field and electrolyte chemistry) challenge the deterministic design of electrode materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%